Journal of Dentistry
Volume 28, Issue 4 , Pages 227-232, May 2000

Quality evaluation of process of root canal treatments performed on young adults in Finnish public oral health service

  • S.E Helminen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral Public Health, Institute of Dentistry, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 41, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author
  • ,
  • M Vehkalahti

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral Public Health, Institute of Dentistry, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 41, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
  • ,
  • E Kerosuo

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Infectious Diseases, Institute of Dentistry, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 41, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
    • Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Kuwait
  • ,
  • H Murtomaa

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral Public Health, Institute of Dentistry, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 41, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland

Received 8 October 1999; received in revised form 6 November 1999; accepted 6 December 1999.

Abstract 

Objectives: To evaluate the quality of root canal treatments performed in every-day practice on young adults.

Methods: A quality index related to the treatment process was developed based on the guidelines of the European Society of Endodontology. A random computerised selection of 134 young adults (born 1966–1971) produced 125 (93%) eligible oral health documents, including information on 148 teeth that were root canal treated by 47 dentists. The process of root canal treatment was evaluated according to the original oral health documents. The technical quality of root canal fillings was assessed on postoperative periapical radiographs.

Results: The overall Kappa statistics for the inter-examiner reliability of assessments was 0.63; the proportional agreement being 87%. The mean quality index was 6.2, s.d. 2.0, with none of the treatments scoring the maximum 13. On the 56 available postoperative radiographs, 52% of the fillings were optimal, showing a length within 0–3mm from the radiological apex, no voids in the apical part nor lumen apical to the filling. Of the completed 144 root canal treatments, only 11 included some recorded follow-up information within 15months from the termination of the treatment.

Conclusions: The technical quality of the root fillings was similar to that found in previous studies. However, the quality index, paucity of pre- and post-operative radiographs, and the lack of follow-up all indicated a discrepancy between consensus guidelines and every-day practice.

Keywords:  Endodontic treatment, Practice guidelines, Public oral health care, Quality evaluation, Treatment process, Young adults

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(99)00076-7

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 28, Issue 4 , Pages 227-232, May 2000