Journal of Dentistry
Volume 38, Issue 3 , Pages 173-181, March 2010

The influence of age on tooth supported fixed prosthetic restoration longevity. A systematic review

  • G. Ioannidis

      Affiliations

    • Kosma Etolou 11, Thessaloniki, Greece
  • ,
  • Th. Paschalidis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Fixed Prosthesis and Implant Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
  • ,
  • H.P. Petridis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Fixed Prosthesis and Implant Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +30 231999575; fax: +30 231999575.
  • ,
  • V. Anastassiadou

      Affiliations

    • Department of Removable Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece

Received 28 July 2009; received in revised form 2 December 2009; accepted 3 December 2009. published online 14 December 2009.

Abstract 

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate the possible influence of age on the longevity of tooth supported fixed prosthetic restorations, using a systematic review process.

Data sources

To identify relevant papers an electronic search was made using various databases (MEDLINE via Pubmed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Register of RCTs, the database of abstracts of Reviews of Effects—DARE), augmented by hand searching of key prosthodontic journals (International Journal of Prosthodontics, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry and Journal of Prosthodontics) and reference cross-check.

Study selection

Assessment and selection of studies identified were conducted in a two phase procedure, by two independent reviewers utilizing specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The minimum mean follow-up time was set at 5 years.

Results

The initial database search yielded 513 relevant titles. After the subsequent filtering process, 22 articles were selected for full-text analysis, finally resulting in 11 studies that met the inclusion criteria. All studies were classified as category C according to the strength of evidence. Meta-analysis was not possible due to the non-uniformity of the data available. The final studies were presented with conflicting results. The majority of the final studies did not report a statistically significant effect of age on fixed prostheses survival, whilst only one study reported poorer prognosis for elderly patients, and two studies reported poorer prognosis for middle-aged patients.

Conclusions

The results of this systematic review showed that increased age of patients should not be considered as a risk factor for the survival of fixed prostheses. Although the majority of studies did not show any effect of age on the survival of fixed prostheses, there was some evidence that middle-aged patients may present with higher failure rates.

Keywords: Systematic review, Age, Failure, Survival, Longevity, Risk factor, Fixed partial denture, Fixed prosthodontics

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(09)00274-7

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2009.12.002

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 38, Issue 3 , Pages 173-181, March 2010