Journal of Dentistry
Volume 38, Issue 3 , Pages 245-252 , March 2010

Effect of a new liner/base on human dentin permeability

  • Richard P. Rusin

      Affiliations

    • 3M ESPE Dental Products, Saint Paul, MN, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: 3M ESPE Dental Products Laboratory, 3M Center 260-5S-12, Maplewood, MN 55144, USA. Tel.: +1 651 733 0127; fax: +1 651 733 0692.
    • ,
  • Kelli Agee

      Affiliations

    • Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
    • ,
  • Michael Suchko

      Affiliations

    • Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
    • ,
  • David H. Pashley

      Affiliations

    • Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA

Received 29 June 2009 ,Revised 10 November 2009 ,Accepted 20 November 2009.

References 

  1. Auschill TM, Koch CA, Wolkewitz M, Hellwig E, Arweiler NB. Occurrence and causing stimuli of postoperative sensitivity in composite restorations. Operative Dentistry. 2009;34(1):3–10
  2. Briso AL, Mestrener SR, Delício G, Sundfeld RH, Bedran-Russo AK, de Alexandre RS, et al. Clinical assessment of postoperative sensitivity in posterior composite restorations. Operative Dentistry. 2007;32:421–426
  3. Christensen GJ. Preventing postoperative tooth sensitivity in class I, II and V restorations. Journal of the American Dental Association. 2002;133:229–231
  4. Christensen GJ. Overcoming the challenges of Class II resin-based composites. Journal of the American Dental Association. 2006;137(7):1021–1023
  5. Brännström M, Astrom A. The hydrodynamics of the dentine; its possible relationship to dentinal pain. International Dentistry Journal. 1972;22:219–227
  6. Brännström M. Sensitivity of dentine. Oral Surgery. 1966;21:517–526
  7. Pashley DH. Dentin permeability, dentin sensitivity, and treatment through tubule occlusion. Journal of Endodontics. 1986;12:465–474
  8. Gordan VV, Mjor IA, Hucke RD, Smith GE. Effect of different liner treatments on postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations. Quintessence International. 1999;30:55–59
  9. Gordan VV, Mjor IA, Moorhead JE. Amalgam restorations: postoperative sensitivity as a function of liner treatment and cavity depth. Operative Dentistry. 1999;24:377–383
  10. Akpata ES, Sadiq W. Post-operative sensitivity in glass-ionomer versus adhesive resin-lined posterior composites. American Journal of Dentistry. 2001;14:34–38
  11. Duke ES, Robbins JW, Trevino D. The clinical performance of a new adhesive resin system in class V and IV restorations. Compendium. 1994;15:852, 854, 856
  12. Browning WD. The benefits of glass ionomer self-adhesive materials in restorative dentistry. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry. 2006;308–314
  13. Hansen EK. Dentin hypersensitivity treated with a fluoride-containing varnish or a light-cured glass-ionomer liner. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research. 1992;100:305–309
  14. Tantbirojn D, Poolthong S, Leevailoj C, Srisawasdi S, Hodges JS, Randall RC. Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass-ionomer liner for cervical dentin hypersensitivity treatment. American Journal of Dentistry. 2006;19:56–60
  15. Polderman RN, Frencken JE. Comparison between effectiveness of a low-viscosity glass ionomer and a resin-based glutaraldehyde containing primer in treating dentine hypersensitivity—a 25.2-month evaluation. Journal of Dentistry. 2007;35:144–149
  16. Ferrari M. Uses of glass-ionomers as bondings, linings, or bases. In:  Davidson CL,  Mjor IA editor. Advances in glass-ionomer cements. Carol Stream, IL, USA: Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc.; 1999;p. 137–148
  17. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, et al. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces. Journal of Dental Research. 2000;79(2):709–714
  18. Rusin RP, Rolf JC, Crawford EA, Cummings KM, Bui HT, Mitra SB. Post-cure flexural modulus in a new liner material. Journal of Dental Research. 2007;86, Special Iss A:2020
  19. Alomari QD, Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB. Effect of liners on cusp deflection and gap formation in composite restorations. Operative Dentistry. 2001;26(4):406–411
  20. Alomari Q, Ajlouni R, Omar R. Managing the polymerization shrinkage of resin composite restorations: a review. South African Dental Journal. 2007;62(1):12–16
  21. Mitra SB, Rolf JC, Bui HT, Cummings KM, Randall R, and Rusin RP. Effect of an RMGI Liner on Polymerization Shrinkage of Composites. Journal of Dental Research 2008; 87 (Spec Iss A): #1072.
  22. Watson TF, Pagliari D, Sidhu SK, Naasan MA. Confocal microscopic observation of structural changes in glass-ionomer cements and tooth interfaces. Biomaterials. 1998;19:581–588
  23. Fukuda R, Yoshida Y, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Inoue S, Sano H, et al. Bonding efficacy of polyalkenoic acids to hydroxyapatite, enamel and dentin. Biomaterials. 2003;24(11):1861–1867
  24. Mitra SB, Lee CY, Bui HT, Tantbirojn D, Rusin RP. Long-term adhesion and mechanism of bonding of a paste-liquid resin-modified glass-ionomer. Dental Materials. 2009;25:459–466
  25. Friedl KH, Powers JM, Hiller KA. Influence of different factors on bond strength of hybrid ionomers. Operative Dentistry. 1995;20(2):74–80
  26. Prati C, Simpson M, Mitchem J, Tao L, Pashley DH. Relationship between bond strength and microleakage measured in the same Class I restorations. Dental Materials. 1992;8:37–41
  27. Mitra SB. In vitro fluoride release from a light-cured glass ionomer liner/base. Journal of Dental Research. 1991;70:75–78
  28. Fitch J, Cummings KM, Rusin RP. Fluoride release from a new protective coating. Journal of Dental Research 2008; 87 (Spec Iss A): #845.
  29. ten Cate JM, van Duinen RN. Hypermineralization of dentinal lesions adjacent to glass-ionomer cement restorations. Journal of Dental Research. 1995;74:1266–1271
  30. Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH, Versluis A. Inhibitive effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement on remote artificial caries. Caries Research. 1997;31:275–280
  31. Donly KJ, Segura A, Kanellis M, Erickson RL. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. Journal of the American Dental Association. 1999;130:1459–1466
  32. Glasspoole EA, Erickson RL, Davidson CL. Demineralization of enamel in relation to the fluoride release of materials. American Journal of Dentistry. 2001;14:8–12
  33. Coomes A, Donly K. Demineralization inhibition of glass ionomer base in class V preparations. Journal of Dental Research 2008; 87 (Spec Iss A) #364.
  34. Tantbirojn D, Rusin RP, Bui HT, Mitra SB. In vitro dentin caries inhibition adjacent to a glass ionomer-composite sandwich restoration. Quintessence International. 2009;40:287–294
  35. Youngson CC, Jones JC, Fox K, Smith IS, Wood DJ, Gale M. A fluid filtration and clearing technique to assess microleakage associated with three dentine bonding systems. Journal of Dentistry. 1999;27:223–233
  36. Prati C, Tao L, Simpson M, Pashley DH. Permeability and microleakage of Class II resin composite restorations. Journal of Dentistry. 1994;22:49–56
  37. Özok AR, DeGee AJ, Wu M-K, Wesselink PR. The influence of resin composite and bonded amalgam restorations on dentine permeability in Class II cavities in vitro. Dental Materials. 2001;17:477–484
  38. Özok AR, Wu M-K, DeGee AJ, Wesselink PR. Effect of dentin perfusion on the sealing ability and microtensile bond strength of a total-etch vs. all-in-one adhesive. Dental Materials. 2004;20:479–486
  39. Yiu CKY, Hiraishi N, Chersoni S, Breschi L, Ferrari M, Prati C, et al. Single-bottle adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. II. Differential permeability reduction with an oxalate desensitizer. Journal of Dentistry. 2006;34:106–116
  40. Sauro S, Pashley DH, Montanari M, Chersoni S, Carvalho RM, Toledano M, et al. Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on dentin permeability and adhesion of self-etch adhesives. Dental Materials. 2007;23:705–713
  41. Ruhland AR, Kolker JL, Vargas MA, Armstrong SR. Effect of self-etching primers on dentin permeability. Journal of Dental Research. 2002;82:2626
  42. Cadenaro M, Antoniolli F, Sauro S, Tay FR, De Lenarda R, Prati C. Degree of conversion and permeability of dental adhesives. European Journal of Oral Science. 2005;113:525–530
  43. Tanaka H, Shimizu H, Sakamoto A, Yamamoto T, Nishtani Y, Yoshiyama M, et al., Journal of Dental Research 2007; 86 (Special Iss A): #362.
  44. Grégoire G, Guignes P, Millas A. Effect of self-etching adhesives on dentin permeability in a fluid flow model. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2005;93:56–63
  45. Orucoglu H, Belli S. Evaluation of the effect of four self-etching adhesives on dentin permeability. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research B: Applied Biomaterials. 2009;90(1):110–115
  46. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Villanueva R, Tay FR. The use of oxalate to reduce dentin permeability under adhesive restorations. American Journal of Dentistry. 2001;14:89–94
  47. Zhang Y, Agee K, Pashley DH, Pashley DH, Pashley EL. The effects of Pain-Free® desensitizer on dentine permeability and tubule occlusion over time, in vitro. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1998;25:884–891
  48. Camps J, Pizant S, Dejou J, Franquin JC. Effects of desensitizing agents on human dentin permeability. American Journal of Dentistry. 1998;11:286–290
  49. Sidhu SK, Agee KA, Waller JL, Pashley DH. In vitro evaporative vs. convective water flux across human dentin before and after conditioning and placement of glass-ionomer cements. American Journal of Dentistry. 2004;17:211–215
  50. Kolker JL, Vargas MA, Armstrong SR, Dawson DV. Effect of desensitizing agents on dentin permeability and tubule occlusion. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2002;4:211–221
  51. Rusin RP, Agee K, Suchko M, Cummings KM, Pashley DH. Dentin permeability of a new protective coating on smear-layer dentin. Journal of Dental Research 2008; 87 (Spec Iss B): #2948.
  52. Rusin RP, Agee K, Suchko M, Cummings KM, Pashley DH. Dentin Permeability of a New Protective Coating Material. Journal of Dental Research 2008; 87 (Spec Iss A): #1041.
  53. Pashley DH, Matthews WG, Zhang Y, Johnson M. Fluid shifts across human dentine in vitro in response to hydrodynamic stimuli. Archives of Oral Biology. 1996;41:1065–1072
  54. Charoenlarp P, Wanachantararak S, Vongsavan N, Matthews B. Pain and the rate of dentinal fluid flow produced by hydrostatic pressure stimulation of exposed dentine in man. Archives of Oral Biology. 2007;52:625–631
  55. Gillam DG, Mordan NJ, Newman HN. The dentin disc surface: a plausible model for dentin physiology and dentin sensitivity evaluation. Advances in Dental Research. 1997;11:487–501
  56. Pashley DH, Livingston MJ, Reeder OW, Horner J. Effects of the degree of tubule occlusion on the permeability of human dentine in vitro. Archives of Oral Biology. 1978;23:1127–1133
  57. Oliveira SS, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, Watanabe LG, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system. Dental Materials. 2003;19(8):758–767
  58. Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G, Lopes AL. Field emission SEM comparison of four postfixation drying techniques for human dentin. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 1995;29(9):1111–1120
  59. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshimda Y, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, et al. Microscopy investigations. Techniques, results, limitations. American Journal of Dentistry. 2000;13:3D–18D
  60. Pashley DH, Tao L, Boyd L, King GE, Horner JA. Scanning electron microscopy of the substructure of smear layers in human dentine. Archives of Oral Biology. 1988;33:265–270
  61. Pashley DH, Dentin: . A dynamic substrate—a review. Scanning Microscopy. 1989;3:161–174
  62. Sidhu SK, Agee K, Pashley DH. The influences of glass ionomers on water flux across dentin. Journal of Dental Research. 2003;82, Spec Iss B:203
  63. Banomyong D, Palamara JE, Burrow MF, Messer HH. Effect of dentin conditioning on dentin permeability and micro-shear bond strength. European Journal of Oral Science. 2007;115:502–509
  64. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM. Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion. Journal of Dentistry. 1997;25:355–362
  65. Lin A, McIntyre NS, Davidson RD. Studies on the adhesion of glass ioner cements to dentin. Journal of Dental Research. 1992;71:1836–1841
  66. Titley KC, Smith DC, Chernecky R. SEM observations of the reactions of the components of a light-activated glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement on bovine dentine. Journal of Dentistry. 1996;24:411–416
  67. Carvalho RM, Yoshiyama M, Horner JA, Pashley DH. Bonding mechanism of Variglass to dentin. American Journal of Dentistry. 1995;8:253–258
  68. Mitra SB, Bui HT, Cummings KM, Rolf JC, Rusin RP. Post-Cure adhesion of RMGI liner materials. Journal of Dental Research 2009; 88 (Spec Iss A): #3177.
  69. Bui QNT, Perry R, Kugel G. Microleakage in Class V restorations in vitro. Journal of Dental Research 2008; 87 (Spec Iss A): #684.
  70. De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ. Shear bond strength of Vitrebond Plus to dentin and enamel. Journal of Dental Research 2007; 86 (Special Iss A): #2444.
  71. Bui HT, Rolf JC, Cummings KM, Rusin RP, Mitra SB. Flexural Strength of a New Liner/Base Material. Journal of Dental Research 2006; 85 (Spec Iss A): #1892.

☆ Portions of this study were presented at the AADR meeting, April 2–5, 2008, Dallas, and at the IADR meeting, July 2–5, 2008, Toronto.

PII: S0300-5712(09)00257-7

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.11.004

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 38, Issue 3 , Pages 245-252 , March 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution