Journal of Dentistry
Volume 38, Issue 3 , Pages 232-236, March 2010

Better oral health related quality of life: Type of prosthesis or psychological robustness?

  • E. Emami

      Affiliations

    • Département de dentisterie de restauration, Faculté de Médecine dentaire, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
  • ,
  • P.J. Allison

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
  • ,
  • P. de Grandmont

      Affiliations

    • Département de dentisterie de restauration, Faculté de Médecine dentaire, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
  • ,
  • P.H. Rompré

      Affiliations

    • Département de stomatologie, Faculté de Médecine dentaire, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
  • ,
  • J.S. Feine

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    • Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: McGill University, 3550 University St., Montreal, Quebec H3A2A7, Canada. Tel.: +1 514 398 7203x00052.

Received 18 September 2009; received in revised form 7 November 2009; accepted 11 November 2009. published online 19 November 2009.

Abstract 

Sense of coherence (SOC) is an individual-based coping characteristic and believed to influence a person's ability to adapt to life stressors, such as edentulism and using complete denture. Thus, SOC may mediate the effect of prosthetic treatment on quality of life.

Objectives

1. To simultaneously test the effect of type of treatment and sense of coherence on oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL) in edentate elders and to identify any interaction. 2. To report the level of sense of coherence among a sample of edentate elders.

Methods

Data were collected and analysed cross-sectionally at a 1-year follow-up from 173 edentulous elders who had randomly received mandibular-implant overdentures or conventional dentures, both opposed by new conventional maxillary dentures. The dependent outcome variable, oral health related quality of life, was measured using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-20). Independent variables included SOC and prosthesis type, as well as socio-demographic variables. SOC was evaluated using the 13-item likert scale of The Orientation to Life questionnaire.

Results

The group mean SOC score was 70.28 (SD=9.6). Married or coupled people had significantly higher SOC scores than those who were separated, single or divorced (p=0.04). General linear model analyses demonstrated that there was a statistically significant main effect for type of prosthesis, F(1.169)=0.71, p=0.008, with no interaction with SOC.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that, in edentulous elders, SOC does not mediate the effect of the type of prosthetic treatment on oral health related quality of life.

Keywords: Oral health related quality of life, Sense of coherence, Clinical trial, Conventional dentures, Mandibular-implant overdentures

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(09)00255-3

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2009.11.002

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 38, Issue 3 , Pages 232-236, March 2010