Journal of Dentistry
Volume 38, Issue 3 , Pages 214-221, March 2010

Hardness, elasticity and ultrastructure of primary tooth dentin bonded with a self-reinforcing one-step self-etch adhesive

  • Y. Hosoya

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Course of Medical and Dental Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1, Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +81 95 819 7673; fax: +81 95 819 7675.
  • ,
  • F.R. Tay

      Affiliations

    • Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
  • ,
  • T. Ono

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral Molecular Biology, Course of Medical and Dental Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1, Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan
  • ,
  • M. Miyazaki

      Affiliations

    • Department of Operative Dentistry, Nihon University School of Dentistry, 1-8-13, Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8310, Japan

Received 27 January 2009; received in revised form 12 September 2009; accepted 22 October 2009. published online 02 November 2009.

Abstract 

Objective

This study evaluated the interfacial quality of sound and caries-affected primary tooth dentin bonded with a self-reinforcing one-step self-etch adhesive.

Methods

Non-carious, sound dentin was prepared with water-cooled high-speed diamond burs. Caries-infected dentin was removed with water-cooled low-speed round steel burs and hand instrument. Dentin was bonded with Bond Force (Tokuyama Dental). A nano-indentation tester was employed for determination of hardness (H) and Young's modulus (Y) of resin–dentin interface. Similar resin–dentin interfaces were examined with a SEM/EDX, and with a TEM using ammoniacal silver nitrate tracer for nanoleakage.

Results

In the comparison of the H and Y values between the interfacial dentin and the underlying mineralized dentin, no significant difference was seen in caries-affected dentin, however, the values of the interfacial dentin were significantly lower in sound dentin. The H value of the interfacial dentin of sound dentin was significantly lower than that of caries-affected dentin with significantly higher Ca content. No significant difference was observed in the Y values of the interfacial dentin of the two substrates. For both sound and caries-affected dentin, TEM revealed silver deposits in the interfacial dentin and adhesive layer, and smear layer remained within the resin–dentin interface. However, Ca and P contents of the adhesive layer at 10μm above the dentin surface were the same as those present in the interfacial dentin.

Conclusions

Both for sound teeth and caries teeth, Bond Force does not prevent the nanoleakage along the resin–dentin interface.

Keywords: Hardness, Young's modulus, Ultrastructure, Caries-affected dentin, Sound dentin, Primary tooth dentin, One-step self-etch adhesive, Self-reinforcing adhesive

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(09)00251-6

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2009.10.006

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 38, Issue 3 , Pages 214-221, March 2010