Journal of Dentistry
Volume 38, Issue 3 , Pages 191-200 , March 2010

Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions

  • Shisei Kubo

      Affiliations

    • Center for Clinical Education and Training, Nagasaki University Hospital, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +81 95 819 7757; fax: +81 95 819 7757.
    • ,
  • Hiroaki Yokota

      Affiliations

    • Clover Dental Clinic, 3-17-13 Shodai, Sawara-ku, Fukuoka 812-0012, Japan
    • ,
  • Haruka Yokota

      Affiliations

    • Clover Dental Clinic, 3-17-13 Shodai, Sawara-ku, Fukuoka 812-0012, Japan
    • ,
  • Yoshihiko Hayashi

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cariology, Department of Developmental and Reconstructive Medicine, Course of Medical and Dental Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan

Received 16 June 2009 ,Revised 8 October 2009 ,Accepted 11 October 2009.

References 

  1. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Possible role of tensile stress in the etiology of cervical erosive lesions of teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1984;52:374–380
  2. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne S, Wilder AD, Sluder TB, Brunson WD. Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: a two-year clinical study. Journal of the American Dental Association. 1991;122:41–47
  3. Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Evaluation of two dentin adhesives in cervical lesions. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1993;70:308–314
  4. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. Journal of the American Dental Association. 1998;129:567–577
  5. Browning WD, Brackett WW, Gilpatrick RO. Two-year clinical comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid resin-based composite in non-carious class V lesions. Operative Dentistry. 2000;25:46–50
  6. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Kanumilli P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, et al. Restoring cervical lesions with flexible composites. Dental Materials. 2007;23:749–754
  7. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dental Materials. 2005;21:864–881
  8. Ishikawa A, Shimada Y, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Micro-tensile and micro-shear bond strengths of current self-etch adhesives to enamel and dentin. American Journal of Dentistry. 2007;20:161–166
  9. Sidhu SK, Omata Y, Tanaka T, Koshiro K, Spreafico D, Semeraro S, et al. Bonding characteristics of newly developed all-in-one adhesives. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2007;80:297–303
  10. Knobloch LA, Gailey D, Azer S, Johnston WM, Clelland N, Kerby RE. Bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesive systems. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2007;97:216–222
  11. Kurokawa H, Miyazaki M, Takamizawa T, Rikuta A, Tsubota K, Uekusa S. One-year clinical evaluation of five single-step self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. Dental Materials Journal. 2007;26:14–20
  12. Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Swift EJ, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD. Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one adhesive in non carious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis. Operative Dentistry. 2008;33:7;p. 370–378.7
  13. Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. A clinical trial comparing two all-in-one adhesive systems used to restore non-carious cervical lesions: results at one year. Australian Dental Journal. 2008;53:235–238
  14. Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, Fieuws S, De Munck J, Cardoso M, Ermis R, et al. A randomized controlled clinical trial of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 1 year. Journal of Dentistry. 2008;36:847–855
  15. Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Two-year clinical evaluation of one-step self-etch systems in non-carious cervical lesions. Journal of Dentistry. 2009;37:149–155
  16. Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. Three-year clinical evaluation of one-step in non-carious cervical lesions. American Journal of Dentistry. 2002;15:309–311
  17. Çelik Ç, Özügnaltay G, Attar N. Clinical evaluation of flowable resin in non-carious cervical lesions: two year results. Operative Dentistry. 2007;32:313–321
  18. Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Microleakage of cervical cavities restored with flowable composites. American Journal of Dentistry. 2004;17:33–37
  19. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dental Materials. 1999;15:128–137
  20. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Water treeing-a potential mechanism for degradation of dentine adhesives. American Journal of Dentistry. 2003;16:6–12
  21. Wang H, Shimada Y, Tagami J. Shear bond stability of current adhesive systems to enamel. Operative Dentistry. 2004;29:168–175
  22. Torkabadi S, Nakajima M, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Bonding durability of HEMA-free and HEMA-containing one-step adhesives to dentine surrounded by bonded enamel. Journal of Dentistry. 2008;36:80–86
  23. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin systems. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1990;64:658–664
  24. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Sakaguchi RL. Thermal expansion coefficient of dental composites measured with strain gauges. Dental Materials. 1996;12:290–294
  25. Watanabe T. Effect of filler content on microleakage of cervical resin composite restorations. Evaluation under flexural load cycling and thermal cycling. Japanese Journal of Conservative Dentistry. 2000;43:308–317
  26. Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Petschelt A. Strength and fatigue performance versus filler fraction of different types of direct dental restoratives. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2006;76:114–120
  27. Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Effect of low-viscosity resin-based composite on the microleakage of cervical restorations. American Journal of Dentistry. 2003;16:244–248
  28. Irie M, Hatanaka K, Suzuki K, Watts DC. Immediate versus water-storage performance of Class V flowable composite restoratives. Dental Materials. 2006;22:875–883
  29. Kubo S, Kawasaki K, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. Journal of Dentistry. 2006;34:97–105
  30. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Five-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2007;9:7–10
  31. Perdigão J, Gomes G, Duarte S, Lopes MM. Enamel Bond strengths of pairs of adhesives from the same manufacturer. Operative Dentistry. 2005;30:492–499
  32. Kubo S. Study on the mechanism of marginal fracture of the posterior composite resins. Part 1. Relation between cavity wall adhesion of the resins and marginal fracture. Japanese Journal of Conservative Dentistry. 1987;30:13–27
  33. Furukawa K, Inai N, Tagami J. The effects of luting resin bond to dentin on the strength of dentin supported by in direct resin composite. Dental Materials. 2002;18:136–142

PII: S0300-5712(09)00244-9

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.10.003

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 38, Issue 3 , Pages 191-200 , March 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution