Journal of Dentistry
Volume 38, Issue 2 , Pages 96-105, February 2010

Resin–dentine interfacial morphology following CPP–ACP treatment

Melbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, 720 Swanston Street, Victoria 3010, Australia

Received 9 July 2009; received in revised form 7 September 2009; accepted 14 September 2009. published online 24 September 2009.

Abstract 

Objectives

To evaluate the quality of bonded resin–dentine interfaces produced by two self-etching primer adhesives after casein phosphopeptide–amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP–ACP) treatment, in comparison to untreated dentine.

Methods

Thirty-four adult molar teeth were sectioned to obtain dentine with tubule orientations parallel/oblique or perpendicular to the surface. The specimens were divided into ‘smear layer’ (1A, 1B) and ‘no smear layer’ groups, after treatment with 15% EDTA (2A, 2B). The specimens were then left either untreated (1A, 2A) or treated (1B, 2B) with CPP–ACP paste (Tooth Mousse, GC Corp.) for 60min×7 days. Each treatment group was divided into three subgroups and specimens etched/conditioned (no conditioning; 30–40% phosphoric acid (H3PO4); 20% polyacrylic acid) and bonded with either a 2-step self-etching primer adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray Medical) or an ‘all-in-one’ adhesive (G-Bond, GC Corp.) and a hybrid resin composite. After 24-h water storage, the bonded specimens were sectioned, polished up to 4000-grit abrasive silicon carbide paper and 0.25-μm diamond paste, prepared for FE-SEM using the acid–base technique, critical point-dried, gold-coated and examined. Bonded and fractured dentine interfaces were also prepared and examined.

Results

The 2-step adhesive produced a similar appearance of bonded resin–dentine interface irrespective of smear layer group, treatment or etching/conditioning. After polyacrylic acid conditioning, the ‘all-in-one’ adhesive exhibited more areas with bond failures. The bond failures were within the hybrid layer and more pronounced following CPP–ACP treatment.

Conclusion

The quality of the bonded resin–dentine interface produced after CPP–ACP treatment may depend on the adhesive system used.

Keywords: Dentine conditioners, Casein phosphopeptide–amorphous calcium phosphate, Interfacial morphology, Scanning electron microscopy, Self-etching primer adhesives, ‘All-in-one’ adhesives

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(09)00224-3

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2009.09.007

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 38, Issue 2 , Pages 96-105, February 2010