Journal of Dentistry
Volume 38, Issue 1 , Pages 44-49, January 2010

Influences of surface and solvent on retention of HEMA/mixture components after evaporation

  • Fernanda C.P. Garcia

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Area, University of Brasília-UnB, DF, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: QRSW 05 Bloco B3 Apto 302, Sudoeste, Brasilia, DF, CEP 70675523, Brazil. Tel.: +55 61 8112 7078; fax: +55 61 3372 1055.
  • ,
  • Linda Wang

      Affiliations

    • Departament of Operative Dentistry, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil
  • ,
  • Lúcia C.G. Pereira

      Affiliations

    • Anápolis School of Dentistry, UniEvangélica, Goiás, GO, Brazil
  • ,
  • Safira M. de Andrade e Silva

      Affiliations

    • College of Health and Agrarian Sciences – UNIME, Lauro de Freitas- BA, Brazil
  • ,
  • Luiz M. Júnior

      Affiliations

    • Departament of Operative Dentistry, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil
  • ,
  • Marcela Rocha de Oliveira Carrilho

      Affiliations

    • GEO/Bandeirante University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Received 15 October 2008; received in revised form 25 August 2009; accepted 1 September 2009. published online 07 September 2009.

Abstract 

Objectives

This study examined the retention of solvents within experimental HEMA/solvent primers after two conditions for solvent evaporation: from a free surface or from dentine surface.

Methods

Experimental primers were prepared by mixing 35% HEMA with 65% water, methanol, ethanol or acetone (v/v). Aliquots of each primer (50μl) were placed on glass wells or they were applied to the surface of acid-etched dentine cubes (2mm×2mm×2mm) (n=5). For both conditions (i.e. from free surface or dentine cubes), change in primers mass due to solvent evaporation was gravimetrically measured for 10min at 51% RH and 21°C. The rate of solvent evaporation was calculated as a function of loss of primers mass (%) over time. Data were analysed by two-way ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls (p<0.05).

Results

There were significant differences between solvent retention (%) and evaporation rate (%/min) depending on the solvent present in the primer and the condition for evaporation (from free surface or dentine cubes) (p<0.05). For both conditions, the greatest amount of retained solvent was observed for HEMA/water primer. The rate of solvent evaporation for HEMA/acetone primer was almost 2- to 10-times higher than for HEMA/water primer depending whether evaporation occurred, respectively, from a free surface or dentine cubes. The rate of solvent evaporation varied with time, being in general highest at the earliest periods.

Conclusions

The rate of solvent evaporation and its retention into HEMA/solvent primers was influenced by the type of the solvent and condition allowed for their evaporation.

Keywords: Solvents, Evaporation, Dentine

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(09)00209-7

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2009.09.003

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 38, Issue 1 , Pages 44-49, January 2010