Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 12 , Pages 923-931, December 2009

Effect of saliva contamination on bond strength of resin luting cements to dentin

  • C.W.M. Chung

      Affiliations

    • Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, 34 Hospital Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China
  • ,
  • C.K.Y. Yiu

      Affiliations

    • Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, 34 Hospital Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +852 2859 0251; fax: +825 2559 3803.
  • ,
  • N.M. King

      Affiliations

    • Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, 34 Hospital Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China
  • ,
  • N. Hiraishi

      Affiliations

    • Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, 34 Hospital Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China
  • ,
  • F.R. Tay

      Affiliations

    • Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA

Received 16 January 2009; received in revised form 13 July 2009; accepted 28 July 2009. published online 05 August 2009.

Abstract 

Objectives

This study examined the effect of saliva contamination on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of resin luting cements to dentin.

Methods

For RelyX ARC (ARC, 3M ESPE), dentin surfaces were etched with 32% phosphoric acid. The subgroups were: ARC-control (uncontaminated), ARC-I (saliva contamination, blot-dried), ARC-II (saliva contamination, rinse, blot-dried) and ARC-III (saliva contamination, rinse, re-etch, rinse, blot-dried). For Panavia F 2.0 (PF, Kuraray), the subgroups were: PF-control (uncontaminated), PF-I (saliva contamination, dried), PF-II (saliva contamination, rinse, dried), PF-III (primer, saliva contamination, dried), PF-IV (primer, saliva contamination, dried, primer re-applied) and PF-V (primer, saliva contamination, rinse, dried, primer re-applied). Composite blocks were luted onto dentin using the two cements. Bonded specimens were sectioned into 0.9mm×0.9mm beams for μTBS testing. Representative fractured beams were prepared for fractographic analysis.

Results

For ARC, salivary contamination of etched dentin (ARC-I) significantly lowered bond strength (p=0.001). Rinsing saliva off with water (ARC-II) restored bond strength to control level. Re-etching dentin surface after rinsing (ARC-III) resulted in the lowest bond strength (p<0.001). For PF, salivary contamination of dentin before (PF-I) and after application of primer (PF-III and PF-IV) significantly lowered bond strength (p<0.001). Rinsing saliva off with water and re-application of primer (PF-II and PF-V) improved bond strength.

Conclusion

Saliva contamination during luting deteriorated the bond quality of resin cements. Decontamination by rinsing with water was most effective in restoring the bond strength of RelyX ARC. Decontamination by water-rinsing and primer re-application after rinsing improved the bond strength of Panavia F 2.0.

Keywords: Resin cement, Saliva, Contamination, Microtensile bond strength, Dentin

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(09)00182-1

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2009.07.007

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 12 , Pages 923-931, December 2009