Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 11 , Pages 827-834, November 2009

Caries management decision: Influence of dentist and patient factors in the provision of dental services

  • S. Doméjean-Orliaguet

      Affiliations

    • CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service d’Odontologie, Hôtel-Dieu, F-63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France
    • Univ Clermont1, UFR d’Odontologie, EA 3847, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: UFR d’Odontologie, 11 Boulevard Charles de Gaulle, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France. Tel.: +33 4 73 17 73 17; fax: +33 4 73 17 73 09.
  • ,
  • S. Léger

      Affiliations

    • Univ Blaise Pascal, Département de Mathématiques, F-63177 Aubière, France
  • ,
  • C. Auclair

      Affiliations

    • CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service de Santé Publique, Hôtel-Dieu, F-63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France
  • ,
  • L. Gerbaud

      Affiliations

    • CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service de Santé Publique, Hôtel-Dieu, F-63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France
    • Univ Clermont1, Faculté de Médecine, F-63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France
  • ,
  • S. Tubert-Jeannin

      Affiliations

    • CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service d’Odontologie, Hôtel-Dieu, F-63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France
    • Univ Clermont1, UFR d’Odontologie, EA 3847, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France

Received 6 April 2009; received in revised form 18 June 2009; accepted 19 June 2009. published online 29 June 2009.

Abstract 

Objectives

Little is known about how dentists implement caries management and provide restorative dental services in everyday practice. This study explored whether or not recent concepts in caries management were implemented in practice by private practitioners. The influence of patient and practitioner characteristics on the provision of restorative dental services was also investigated through multidimensional analyses.

Methods

A sample of French general private dental practitioners was asked to record the characteristics of 35 preventive or restorative treatments made on vital permanent teeth. The data collection form was designed to explore dentists’ attitudes towards caries management and their use of minimally invasive therapies.

Results

Twenty-six practitioners recorded the characteristics of 921 treatments performed on 457 patients. Results indicate that participants rarely performed non-invasive treatments. They used an inappropriate detection tool, as most of decisions to treat were based on visual inspection frequently associated with probing. Multidimensional analysis showed that dentists provided different restorative treatments depending on patient characteristics, with minimally invasive, esthetic restorations preferentially performed for healthy, young and well-insured patients. Restorative treatments and detection tools also varied markedly among practitioners. These variations in service patterns were not related to a specific patient profile in each dental practice.

Conclusions

Results indicate that recent concepts in caries management have not yet been adopted in everyday practice. Patient and dentist characteristics influence the provision of restorative dental services. Decision-making in caries management not only depends on pathophysiology but also seems to be influenced by many other factors.

Keywords: Health services research, Dentist practice patterns, Clinical decision-making, Dental caries, Restorative dentistry, Preventive dentistry

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(09)00160-2

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2009.06.012

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 11 , Pages 827-834, November 2009