Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 10 , Pages 786-790, October 2009

Potential agents to control enamel caries-like lesions

  • F.C. Rehder Neto

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • F.A. Maeda

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • C.P. Turssi

      Affiliations

    • Laboratory of Biomaterials Research, School of Dentistry, University of Uberaba, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil
  • ,
  • M.C. Serra

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, Av. do Café, s/n Monte Alegre, CEP: 14040-904 Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. Tel.: +55 16 3602 4075; fax: +55 16 3633 4187.

Received 3 December 2008; received in revised form 8 June 2009; accepted 11 June 2009. published online 19 June 2009.

Abstract 

Objectives

To assess whether pastes containing casein phosphopeptide–amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP–ACP) and calcium sodium phosphosilicate (CSP) control artificial caries lesion progression.

Methods

Enamel slabs of bovine teeth were embedded in polyester resin and had their enamel surfaces serially polished, and tested for surface microhardness (SMH, 25g, 5s). Incipient caries-like lesions were pre-formed and specimens were evaluated by microhardness test (SMHpost-lesion) and randomly assigned to five treatment groups (n=15): (1) regular dentifrice (RE, 1,100ppm F); (2) dentifrice with calcium sodium phosphosilicate (CSP); (3) amorphous calcium phosphate stabilized by casein phosphopeptide (CPP–ACP); (4) CPP–ACP with 900ppm F (CPP–ACP+F) and (5) control group—unexposed to any remineralizing agent. Treatments were applied five times, after the de-remineralization period in the cariogenic challenges. Post-treatments SMH measurements were conducted (SMHpost-treatment).

Results

ANOVA was applied for data evaluation and revealed a significant difference among the treatments (p=0.0161). Tukey's test was conducted and the percentage of mineral loss was calculated. Specimens exposed to CSP (7.1%), RE (6.7%) and CPP–ACP+F (3.8%) showed lower mineral loss than those that in the control group (−11.0%). CPP–ACP group (3.2%) differed from the control, CSP and RE groups.

Conclusions

Depending on the agent used, a remineralizing effect may be expected, which reflects in caries lesions progression.

Keywords: Dental caries, Microhardness, CCP–ACP, Calcium sodium phosphosilicate

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(09)00151-1

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2009.06.008

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 10 , Pages 786-790, October 2009