Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 10 , Pages 781-785, October 2009

Interplay between fluoride and abrasivity of dentifrices on dental erosion–abrasion

  • Anderson T. Hara

      Affiliations

    • Oral Health Research Institute, Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, Indiana University School of Dentistry, 415 N. Lansing Street, Indianapolis, 46202-2876 IN, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 317 274 8822; fax: +1 317 274 5425.
  • ,
  • Carlos González-Cabezas

      Affiliations

    • Oral Health Research Institute, Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, Indiana University School of Dentistry, 415 N. Lansing Street, Indianapolis, 46202-2876 IN, USA
  • ,
  • Jonathan Creeth

      Affiliations

    • GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, Weybridge, UK
  • ,
  • Madhu Parmar

      Affiliations

    • GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, Weybridge, UK
  • ,
  • George J. Eckert

      Affiliations

    • Division of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
  • ,
  • Domenick T. Zero

      Affiliations

    • Oral Health Research Institute, Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, Indiana University School of Dentistry, 415 N. Lansing Street, Indianapolis, 46202-2876 IN, USA

Received 26 March 2009; received in revised form 8 June 2009; accepted 10 June 2009. published online 19 June 2009.

Abstract 

Objectives

Eroded teeth are more susceptible to toothbrushing wear than sound teeth. We tested the hypothesis that fluoride and abrasivity of dentifrices can interact, modulating the development of erosive–abrasive lesions.

Methods

Human enamel and root dentin specimens were submitted to cycles of demineralization, remineralization and toothbrushing using six dentifrices formulated with three different abrasivity levels: low (L), medium (M) and high (H); with (+F) and without (−F) fluoride. Surface loss was quantified by optical profilometry and compared among groups (α=0.05).

Results

In dentin, it was ranked: L<M<H, for both +F and −F dentifrices. In enamel, +F dentifrices had similar results; however for −F formulations, M and H did not differ. Fluoride reduced surface loss in enamel, at all abrasive levels. In dentin, the same fluoride effect was observed but only for the low abrasive formulation.

Conclusions

Both fluoride and abrasivity were important modulators of enamel surface loss, while abrasivity had a higher impact than fluoride on dentin.

Keywords: Enamel, Dentin, Erosion, Abrasion, Wear, Toothbrush, Dentifrice, Fluoride

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(09)00148-1

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2009.06.006

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 10 , Pages 781-785, October 2009