Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 9 , Pages 673-678 , September 2009

Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden

  • Karin Sunnegårdh-Grönberg

      Affiliations

    • Department of Odontology, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +46 90 7856021; fax: +46 90 770580.
    • ,
  • Jan W.V. van Dijken

      Affiliations

    • Department of Odontology, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
    • ,
  • Ulrika Funegård

      Affiliations

    • Department of Education, Dental School, 901 85 Umeå, Sweden
    • ,
  • Anders Lindberg

      Affiliations

    • Department of Education, Dental School, 901 85 Umeå, Sweden
    • ,
  • Mats Nilsson

      Affiliations

    • Futurum, County Hospital Ryhov, 551 85 Jönköping, Sweden

Received 4 February 2009 ,Revised 17 April 2009 ,Accepted 24 April 2009.

References 

  1. Forss H, Widström E. From amalgam to composite: selection of restorative materials and restoration longevity in Finland. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2001;59:57–62
  2. van Dijken JWV. A 6-year clinical evaluation Class I poly-acid modified resin composite/resin composite laminate and resin composite restorations cured with a two-step curing technique. Dental Materials. 2003;19:423–428
  3. van Dijken JWV, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K. A four-year clinical evaluation of a highly filled hybrid resin composite in Class II cavities. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2005;7:343–349
  4. Lindberg A, van Dijken JWV, Lindberg M. Nine-year evaluation of a poly-acid-modified resin composite open sandwich technique in class II cavities. Journal of Dentistry. 2006;35:124–129
  5. Mjör IA. Selection of restorative materials in general dental practice in Sweden. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1997;55:53–57
  6. Lundström S, Särndal C-E. Estimation in the presence of no response and frame imperfections. Statistics Sweden, Örebro, Sweden; 2002. ISBN 91-618-1107-6.
  7. Sundberg H. Användningen av amalgam år 2002 inom folktandvården. National Board of Health and Welfare, Sweden, Dnr 53-1572/2003.
  8. Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1990;48:305–311
  9. Pink FE, Minden NJ, Simmonds S. Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general practice settings. Operative Dentistry. 1994;19:127–132
  10. Friedl K-H, Hiller K-A, Schmalz G. Placement and replacement of composite restorations in Germany. Operative Dentistry. 1995;20:34–38
  11. Mjör IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE. Age of restorations at replacement in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2000;58:97–101
  12. Forss H, Widström E. Reasons for restorative therapy and the longevity of restorations in adults. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2004;62:82–86
  13. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE. Selection of restorative materials in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1999;57:257–262
  14. Mjör IA, Toffenetti F. Placement and replacement of resin-based composite restorations in Italy. Operative Dentistry. 1992;17:82–85
  15. Lucarotti PSK, Holder RL, Burke FJT. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (Part 3): variation by dentist factors. Journal of Dentistry. 2005;33:827–835
  16. Wilson NHF, Burke FJT, Mjör IA. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom. Quintessence International. 1997;28:245–248
  17. Burke FJT, Cheung SW, Mjör IA, Wilson NHF. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom. Quintessence International. 1999;30:234–242
  18. Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Cheung SW, Mjör IA. Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement. Journal of Dentistry. 2001;29:317–324
  19. Palotie U, Vehkalahti M. Reasons for replacements and the age of failed restorations in posterior teeth of young Finish adults. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2002;60:325–329
  20. Downer MC, Azli NA, Bedi R, Moles DR, Setchell DJ. How long do routine dental restorations last? A systemic review. British Dental Journal. 1999;187:432–439
  21. Mjör IA, Shen C, Eliasson ST, Richter S. Placement and replacement of restorations in general practice in Iceland. Operative Dentistry. 2002;27:117–123
  22. Friedl K-H, Hiller K-A, Schmalz G. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Germany. Operative Dentistry. 1994;19:228–232
  23. Jokstad A, Mjör IA, Qvist V. The age of restorations in situ. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1994;52:234–242
  24. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE. Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice. International Dental Journal. 2000;50:361–366
  25. Burke FJT, Lucarotti PSK, Holder RL. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (Part 2): variation by patient’ characteristics. Journal of Dentistry. 2005;33:817–826

PII: S0300-5712(09)00096-7

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.04.010

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 9 , Pages 673-678 , September 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution