Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 9 , Pages 673-678, September 2009

Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden

  • Karin Sunnegårdh-Grönberg

      Affiliations

    • Department of Odontology, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +46 90 7856021; fax: +46 90 770580.
  • ,
  • Jan W.V. van Dijken

      Affiliations

    • Department of Odontology, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
  • ,
  • Ulrika Funegård

      Affiliations

    • Department of Education, Dental School, 901 85 Umeå, Sweden
  • ,
  • Anders Lindberg

      Affiliations

    • Department of Education, Dental School, 901 85 Umeå, Sweden
  • ,
  • Mats Nilsson

      Affiliations

    • Futurum, County Hospital Ryhov, 551 85 Jönköping, Sweden

Received 4 February 2009; received in revised form 17 April 2009; accepted 24 April 2009. published online 05 May 2009.

Abstract 

Objectives

To investigate the selection of direct restorative materials and longevity of replaced restorations in relation to operator and patients characteristics.

Methods

A cross-sectional study of treatment in practice, recording all new placements and replacements of direct restorations was performed during 2 weeks comprising all dentists within the Public Dental Health clinics in the county council of Västerbotten.

Results

A total of 2834 data collection sheets, one for each placed restoration, were received with a dropout of 10%. Restorations analyzed in the study were placed in permanent teeth in patients older than 15 years. First restorations placed due to primary caries were 671 and replacements 1536. Class II was the most frequently treated cavity followed by class I. The median longevity of replaced restorations was for amalgam, resin based composite and glass ionomer 16, 6 and 11 years, respectively. High caries risk patients showed shorter longevity for resin based composite restorations than low or moderate risk patients. Secondary caries as reason for failure for class II resin based composite restorations occurred significantly later than loss or fracture. Significantly longer longevity was observed for replaced restorations executed by more experienced dentists.

Conclusions

The use of amalgam was negligible and the material was predominantly replaced by resin based composites in first and replaced restorations. Class II was the most frequent placed and replaced restorations. Caries risk and experience of operator influenced longevity of replacements.

Keywords: Replacement, Restorations, Clinical, Longevity, Resin composite, Amalgam

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(09)00096-7

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2009.04.010

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 9 , Pages 673-678, September 2009