Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 8 , Pages 622-626 , August 2009

Effects of adhesive composite core systems on adaptation of adhesive post and cores under load

Received 16 December 2008 ,Revised 14 April 2009 ,Accepted 16 April 2009.

References 

  1. Torbjorner A, Fransson B. A literature review on the prostetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. International Journal of Prosthodontic. 2004;17:369–376
  2. Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Avishai S. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature. Part 1. Composition and micro- and macrostructure alterations. Quintessence International. 2007;9:733–743
  3. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Effect of post adaptation on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1990;64:419–424
  4. Maccari PC, Condeicao EN, Nunes MF. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three different prefabricated esthetic posts. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2003;15:25–30
  5. Dietschi D, Romelli M, Goretti A. Adaptation of adhesive posts and cores to dentin after fatigue testing. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 1997;10:498–507
  6. Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, Krejci I, Meyer JM, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dental Material. 2003;19:199–205
  7. Mannocci F, Sheriff M, Ferrari M, Waston TF. Microtensile bond strength and confocal microscopy of dental adhesives bonded to root canal dentin. American Journal of Dentistry. 2001;14:200–204
  8. Mannocci F, Bertelli E, Watson Tf, Ford TP. Resin–dentin interfaces of endodontically-treated restored teeth. American Journal of Dentistry. 2003;16:28–32
  9. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Cagidiaco MC, Mjor IA. Bonding to root canal: structural characteristics of substrate. American Journal of Dentistry. 2000;13:255–260
  10. Goracci C, Grandini S, Bossu M, Bertelli E, Ferrari M. Laboratory assessment of the retentive potential of adhesive posts: a review. Journal of Dentistry. 2007;35:827–835
  11. Grandini S, Goracci C, Tay FR, Grandini R, Ferrari M. Clinical evaluation of the use of fiber posts and direct resin restorations for endodontically treated teeth. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2005;18:399–404
  12. Van Dijken JW, Sunnegardh-Grönber K, Lindberg A. Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation. Dental Material. 2007;23:1101–1107
  13. Bortolotto T, Ferrari M, Tay F, Krejci I. Degradation of thermo-mechanically loaded adhesive Class V restorations after 18 months of water storage. American Journal of Dentistry. 2007;20:83–89
  14. Monticelli F, Osorio R, Sadek FT, Radovic I, Toledano M, Ferrari M. Surface treatments for improving bond strength to prefabricated fiber posts: a literature review. Operative Dentistry. 2008;33:346–355
  15. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1994;71:565–567

PII: S0300-5712(09)00091-8

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.04.005

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 8 , Pages 622-626 , August 2009