Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 11 , Pages 813-819 , November 2009

Four-year clinical performance and marginal analysis of pressed glass ceramic inlays luted with ormocer restorative vs. conventional luting composite

  • Norbert Krämer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University Medical Center Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
    • ,
  • Christian Reinelt

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, Nuremberg, Germany
    • ,
  • Gert Richter

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Medical Center Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
    • ,
  • Roland Frankenberger

      Affiliations

    • Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontology, University of Marburg, Georg-Voigt-Str. 3, 35039 Marburg, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +49 6421 5863240; fax: +49 6421 5863245.

Received 18 February 2009 ,Revised 31 March 2009 ,Accepted 6 April 2009.

References 

  1. Fuzzi M, Rappelli G. Survival rate of ceramic inlays. Journal of Dentistry. 1998;26:623–626
  2. Hayashi M, Yeung CA. Ceramic inlays for restoring posterior teeth. Australian Dental Journal. 2004;49:60–67
  3. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore memorial lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Operative Dentistry. 2004;29:481–508
  4. Blatz M. The clinical long-term success of ceramic restorations. Part I. Inlays and onlays. Practical Procedures and Aesthetic Dentistry. 2004;16:622
  5. Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. American Journal of Dentistry. 2000;13:60D–76D
  6. Pallesen U, van Dijken JW. An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2000;108:239–246
  7. Posselt A, Kerschbaum T. Longevity of 2328 chairside Cerec inlays and onlays. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry. 2003;6:231–248
  8. Reiss B. Clinical results of Cerec inlays in a dental practice over a period of 18 years. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry. 2006;9:11–22
  9. Sjogren G, Molin M, van Dijken JW. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2004;17:241–246
  10. Frankenberger R, Reinelt C, Petschelt A, Krämer N. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays. Dent Mater. 2009;25:960–968
  11. Hayashi M, Tsuchitani Y, Kawamura Y, Miura M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S. Eight-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays. Operative Dentistry. 2000;25:473–481
  12. Manhart J, Chen HY, Neuerer P, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Hickel R. Three-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays. American Journal of Dentistry. 2001;14:95–99
  13. Roulet JF. Longevity of glass ceramic inlays and amalgam—results up to 6 years. Clinical Oral Investigations. 1997;1:40–46
  14. Felden A, Schmalz G, Federlin M, Hiller KA. Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: results up to 7 years. Clinical Oral Investigations. 1998;2:161–167
  15. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Schaible RB, Nikolaenko SA, Naumann M. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements. Dental Materials. 2008;24:185–191
  16. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2001;3:45–64
  17. Frankenberger R, Taschner M, Garcia-Godoy F, Petschelt A, Krämer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after 12 years. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2008;10:393–398
  18. Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Petschelt A. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Operative Dentistry. 2000;25:324–330
  19. De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. Journal of Dental Research. 2005;84:118–132
  20. Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Ikeda T, Van Landuyt KL, Maida T, et al. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dental Materials. 2007;23:71–80
  21. Frankenberger R, Tay FR. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations. Dental Materials. 2005;21:397–412
  22. Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Nikolaenko SA, Reich SM. Marginal integrity: is the clinical performance of bonded restorations predictable in vitro?. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2007;9(Suppl. 1):107–116
  23. Krämer N, Ebert J, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years. Dental Materials. 2006;22:13–21
  24. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf MJ, Naumann M, Taschner M. Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch?. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2008;10:339–344
  25. Fujitani M, Inokoshi S, Hosoda H. Effect of acid etching on the dental pulp in adhesive composite restorations. International Dental Journal. 1992;42:3–11
  26. Hebling J, Giro EM, Costa CA. Human pulp response after an adhesive system application in deep cavities. Journal of Dentistry. 1999;27:557–564
  27. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Taschner M, Petschelt A, Nikolaenko SA. Adhesive luting revisited: influence of adhesive, temporary cement, cavity cleaning, and curing mode on internal dentin bond strength. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2007;9(Suppl. 2):269–273
  28. Baseren M. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures. Journal of Biomaterials Applications. 2004;19:121–134
  29. Bottenberg P, Jacquet W, Alaerts M, Keulemans F. A prospective randomized clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: five-year results. Journal of Dentistry. 2009;37:198–203

PII: S0300-5712(09)00078-5

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.04.002

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 11 , Pages 813-819 , November 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution