Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 6 , Pages 468-474 , June 2009

5-Year survival of ART restorations with and without cavity disinfection

  • A. Farag

      Affiliations

    • Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University, Minia City, Egypt
    • ,
  • W.J.M. van der Sanden

      Affiliations

    • Department of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, College of Dental Sciences, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    • ,
  • H. Abdelwahab

      Affiliations

    • Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
    • ,
  • J. Mulder

      Affiliations

    • Department of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, College of Dental Sciences, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    • ,
  • J.E. Frencken

      Affiliations

    • Nijmegen International Centre for Oral Health, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, College of Dental Sciences, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +31 24 361 4050; fax: +31 24 354 0265.

Received 12 January 2009 ,Revised 6 March 2009 ,Accepted 6 March 2009.

References 

  1. Ministry of Health and Population . Factors affecting utilization of dental services in primary health care centres and its impact on mothers and child health at urban, rural and slum areas. Cairo, Egypt: Central Dental Department; 2005;
  2. Mohsen MMA. A modified caries morbidity index for assessment of dental hard tissues among three rural populations in the delta of Egypt. Egyptian Dental Journal. 1997;43:2301–2308
  3. Baelum V, van Palenstein Helderman W, Hugoson A, Yee R, Fejerskov O. A global perspective on changes in the burden of caries and periodontitis: implications for dentistry. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2007;34:872–906
  4. Frencken JE, Pilot T, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART): rationale, technique and development. Journal of Public Health Dentistry. 1996;56:135–140
  5. Pan American Health Organization. Oral Health of Low Income Children. Procedures for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment. Final Report. Washington DC: PAHO; 2006.
  6. Van ’t Hof MA, Frencken JE, van Palenstein Helderman WH, Holmgren CJ. The ART approach for managing dental caries: a meta-analysis. International Dental Journal. 2006;56:345–351
  7. Frencken JE, Taifour D, van ‘t Hof MA. Survival of ART and amalgam restorations in permanent teeth after 6.3 years. Journal of Dental Research. 2006;85:622–626
  8. Honkala E, Behbehani J, Ibricevic H, Kerosuo E, Al-Jame G. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach to restoring primary teeth in a standard dental clinic. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2003;13:172–179
  9. Ersin NK, Candan U, Aykut A, Oncag O, Eronat C, Kose T. A clinical evaluation of resin-based composite and glass ionomer cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach: results at 24 months. Journal of American Dental Association. 2006;137:1529–1536
  10. Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dentistry—a review. FDI Commission Project 1-97. International Dental Journal. 2000;50:1–12
  11. Kidd EA. Role of chlorhexidine in the management of dental caries. International Dental Journal. 1991;41:279–286
  12. Järvinen H, Pienihäkkinen K, Huovinen P, Tenovuo J. Susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus to antimicrobial agents after short-term oral chlorhexidine treatments. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 1995;103:32–35
  13. World Health Organization . Oral Health Surveys. Basic Methods. 4th edition. Geneva: WHO; 1997;
  14. Farag A, Frencken J. Acceptance and discomfort from Atraumatic Restorative Treatment in secondary school students in Egypt. Medical Principles and Practice. 2009;17:26–30
  15. Graig RG, Powers JM. Restorative dental materials. 11th ed.. Mosby; 2002;p. 397
  16. Ho TF, Smales RJ, Fang DT. A 2-year clinical study of two glass ionomer cements used in the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 1999;27:195–201
  17. Ersin NK, Aykut A, Candan U, Onçağ O, Eronat C, Kose T. The effect of a chlorhexidine containing cavity disinfectant on the clinical performance of high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement following ART: 24-month results. American Journal of Dentistry. 2008;21:39–43
  18. Bothelo MG. The microtensile bond strength of Fuji IX glass ionomer cement to antibacterial conditioned dentin. Operative Dentistry. 2005;30-3:311–317
  19. Ersin NK, Uzel A, Aykut A, Candan U. Inhibition of cultivable bacteria by chlorhexidine treatment of dentin lesions treated with the ART technique. Caries Research. 2006;40:172–177
  20. Dowling AH, Fleming GJP. Is encapsulation of posterior glass-ionomer restoratives the solution to clinically induced variability introduced on mixing?. Dental Materials. 2008;24:957–966
  21. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hamm G, Hickel R. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Operative Dentistry. 2004;29:481–508
  22. de Souza EM, Cefaly DF, Terada RS, Rodrigues CC, de Lima Navarro MF. Clinical evaluation of the ART technique using high density and resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Oral Health and Preventive Dentistry. 2003;1:201–207
  23. Cefaly DFG, Barata THE, Tapety CMC, Bresciani E, de Lima Navarro MF. Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2005;13:15–19

PII: S0300-5712(09)00046-3

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.03.002

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 6 , Pages 468-474 , June 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution