Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 5 , Pages 374-382 , May 2009

The effect of preparation designs on the marginal and internal gaps in Cerec3 partial ceramic crowns

  • Deoggyu Seo

      Affiliations

    • Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, 134 Shinchon-Dong, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    • ,
  • Youngah Yi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Myongji Hospital, Kwandong University, 697-24 Hwajung-Dong, Deogyang-Gu, Goyang-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of Korea
    • ,
  • Byoungduck Roh

      Affiliations

    • Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, 134 Shinchon-Dong, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +82 2 22283146; fax: +82 2 3137575.

Received 27 October 2008 ,Revised 14 January 2009 ,Accepted 17 January 2009.

References 

  1. Jedynakiewicz NM, Martin N. CEREC: science, research, and clinical application. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry. 2001;22:7–13
  2. Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R. Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM. Journal of Dentistry. 2007;35:68–73
  3. Mou SH, Chai T, Wang JS, Shiau YY. Influence of different convergence angles and tooth preparation heights on the internal adaptation of Cerec crowns. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2002;87:248–255
  4. Fasbinder DJ. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2006;137:22S
  5. Allen KL, Schenkel AB, Estafan D. An overview of the CEREC 3D CAD/CAM system. General Dentistry. 2004;52:234–235
  6. Sadowsky SJ, Sadowsky . An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: a review of the literature. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2006;96:433
  7. Otto T, De Nisco S. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. The International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2002;15:122–128
  8. Reiss B. Clinical results of Cerec inlays in a dental practice over a period of 18 years. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry. 2006;9:11–22
  9. Sadowsky SJ. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: a review of the literature. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2006;96:433–442
  10. Siervo S, Pampalone A, Siervo P, Siervo R. Where is the gap? Machinable ceramic systems and conventional laboratory restorations at a glance. Quintessence International. 1994;25:773–779
  11. Hickel R, Dasch W, Mehl A, Kremers L. CAD/CAM-fillings of the future?. International Dental Journal. 1997;47:247–258
  12. Kokubo Y, Ohkubo C, Tsumita M, Miyashita A, Vult von Steyern P, Fukushima S. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of Procera AllCeram crowns. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2005;32:526–530
  13. Beuer F, Aggstaller H, Edelhoff D, Gernet W, Sorensen J. Marginal and internal fits of fixed dental prostheses zirconia retainers. Dental Materials. 2008;
  14. Nakamura T, Tanaka H, Kinuta S, Akao T, Okamoto K, Wakabayashi K, et al. In vitro study on marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Dental Materials Journal. 2005;24:456–459
  15. Akbar JH, Petrie CS, Walker MP, Williams K, Eick JD. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2006;15:155–163
  16. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. British Dental Journal. 1971;131:107–111
  17. Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K. Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. The International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2003;16:244–248
  18. Reiss B, Walther W. Clinical long-term results and 10-year Kaplan-Meier analysis of Cerec restorations. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry. 2000;3:9–23
  19. Federlin M, Schmidt S, Hiller KA, Thonemann B, Schmalz G. Partial ceramic crowns: influence of preparation design and luting material on internal adaptation. Operative Dentistry. 2004;29:560–570
  20. Bindl A, Mormann WH. Clinical and SEM evaluation of all-ceramic chair-side CAD/CAM-generated partial crowns. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2003;111:163–169
  21. Federlin M, Krifka S, Herpich M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Partial ceramic crowns: influence of ceramic thickness, preparation design and luting material on fracture resistance and marginal integrity in vitro. Operative Dentistry. 2007;32:251–260
  22. Hansen S. Preparations for Cerec 3: where are the limits?. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry. 2000;3:197–205
  23. van Dijken JW, Hasselrot L, Ormin A, Olofsson AL. Restorations with extensive dentin/enamel-bonded ceramic coverage, A 5-year follow-up. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2001;109:222–229
  24. Molin MK, Karlsson SL, Kristiansen MS. Influence of film thickness on joint bend strength of a ceramic/resin composite joint. Dental Materials. 1996;12:245–249
  25. Otto T, Schneider D. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series. The International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2008;21:53–59
  26. Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken JW. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite. The International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2004;17:241–246
  27. Molin MK, Karlsson SL. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems. The International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2000;13:194–200
  28. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM. Clinical performance of CEREC ceramic inlays: a systematic review. Dental Materials. 1999;15:54–61
  29. Hayashi M, Wilson NH, Yeung CA, Worthington HV. Systematic review of ceramic inlays. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2003;7:8–19
  30. Federlin M, Sipos C, Hiller KA, Thonemann B, Schmalz G. Partial ceramic crowns. Influence of preparation design and luting material on margin integrity—a scanning electron microscopic study. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2005;9:8–17
  31. Bindl A, Mormann WH. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2005;32:441–447
  32. Sun J, Lin-Gibson S. X-ray microcomputed tomography for measuring polymerization shrinkage of polymeric dental composites. Dental materials. 2008;24:228–234
  33. Plotino G, Grande NM, Pecci R, Bedini R, Pameijer CH, Somma F. Three-dimensional imaging using microcomputed tomography for studying tooth macromorphology. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2006;137:1555–1561
  34. Parkinson CR, Sasov A. High-resolution non-destructive 3D interrogation of dentin using X-ray nanotomography. Dental materials. 2008;24:773–777
  35. Kakaboura A, Rahiotis C, Watts D, Silikas N, Eliades G. 3D-marginal adaptation versus setting shrinkage in light-cured microhybrid resin composites. Dental materials. 2007;23:272–278
  36. Bjorn AL, Bjorn H, Grkovic B. Marginal fit of restorations and its relation to periodontal bone level. II. Crowns. Odontologisk Revy. 1970;21:337–346
  37. Davis DR. Comparison of fit of two types of all-ceramic crowns. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1988;59:12–16
  38. Schaerer P, Sato T, Wohlwend A. A comparison of the marginal fit of three cast ceramic crown systems. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1988;59:534–542
  39. Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, Wozniak WT. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. The International Journal of Prosthodontics. 1997;10:478–484
  40. Beschnidt SM, Strub JR. Evaluation of the marginal accuracy of different all-ceramic crown systems after simulation in the artificial mouth. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 1999;26:582–593
  41. Wolfart S, Wegner SM, Al-Halabi A, Kern M. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation. The International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2003;16:587–592
  42. Grey NJ, Piddock V, Wilson MA. In vitro comparison of conventional crowns and a new all-ceramic system. Journal of Dentistry. 1993;21:47–51
  43. Wiskott HW, Belser UC, Scherrer SS. The effect of film thickness and surface texture on the resistance of cemented extracoronal restorations to lateral fatigue loading. The International Journal of Prosthodontics. 1999;12:255–262
  44. Tuntiprawon M, Wilson PR. The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. Australian Dental Journal. 1995;40:17–21
  45. Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Krämer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior. Operative Dentistry. 2000;25:459–465
  46. Krämer N, Ebert J, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years. Dental Materials. 2006;22:13–21
  47. Krämer N, Frankenberger R. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. Dental Materials. 2005;21:262–271
  48. Krämer N, Taschner M, Lohbauer U, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Totally bonded ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2008;10:307–314
  49. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Nikolaenko SA, Reich SM. Marginal integrity: is the clinical performance of bonded restorations predictable in vitro?. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2007;9(Suppl 1):107–116

PII: S0300-5712(09)00019-0

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.01.008

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 5 , Pages 374-382 , May 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution