Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 5 , Pages 360-365, May 2009

Single site meta-analysis of 6% hydrogen peroxide whitening strip effectiveness and safety over 2 weeks

  • Robert W. Gerlach

      Affiliations

    • The Procter & Gamble Company, 8700 Mason-Montgomery Road, Mason, OH 45040-8006, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 513 622 0320.
  • ,
  • Matthew L. Barker

      Affiliations

    • The Procter & Gamble Company, 8700 Mason-Montgomery Road, Mason, OH 45040-8006, USA
  • ,
  • Katherine Karpinia

      Affiliations

    • The University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
  • ,
  • Ingvar Magnusson

      Affiliations

    • The University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

Received 12 September 2008; received in revised form 5 January 2009; accepted 10 January 2009.

Abstract 

Objectives

This research evaluated efficacy and safety of 6% hydrogen peroxide whitening strips from a clinical trials database accumulated over a multi-year period at a single site.

Methods

The inclusive meta-analysis involved seven different randomized clinical trials at one dental school. Each study used 6% hydrogen peroxide whitening strips twice daily for 30min over a 2-week period. Common efficacy (digital images) and safety (examination and interview) methods were used across studies. Pooled subject-level data were analyzed using a general linear mixed model to determine overall response and effects of treatment duration on whitening.

Results

The 148 treated subjects were 18–71 years old, with b* (yellowness) ranging from 12 to 22, and L* (lightness) ranging from 69 to 80. After 1-week strip use, the adjusted mean (S.E.) for Δb* was −1.6 (0.08), differing significantly from baseline (p<0.0001). After 2 weeks, the adjusted mean (S.E.) for Δb* was −2.3 (0.07), differing significantly from Week 1 (p<0.0001). The estimated correlation between Weeks 1 and 2 for Δb* was 0.74. Study-to-study variation contributed less than 2% of Δb* variability. Results were similar for ΔL*, with Weeks 1 and 2 estimated means (S.E.) of 1.5 (0.13) and 2.0 (0.12). Occurrence of oral irritation (22%) and tooth sensitivity (20%) did not adversely affect whitening. Other side effects were unremarkable, and only 1 subject (0.7%) discontinued treatment early due to an adverse event.

Conclusions

The meta-analysis of multiple studies conducted at a single clinical site over several years establishes consistent, effective and safe vital bleaching with 6% hydrogen peroxide whitening strips.

Keywords: Whitening, Vital bleaching, Hydrogen peroxide, Clinical trials, Meta-analysis, Imaging

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(09)00008-6

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2009.01.005

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 5 , Pages 360-365, May 2009