Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 5 , Pages 336-341 , May 2009

Validation of enamel erosion in vitro

Received 7 October 2008 ,Revised 4 January 2009 ,Accepted 6 January 2009.

References 

  1. Eisenburger M, Addy M. Erosion and attrition of human enamel in vitro. Part I: Interaction of effects. Journal of Dentistry. 2002;30:341–347
  2. Shaw L, Smith AJ. Dental erosion—the problem and some practical solutions. British Dental Journal. 1998;186:115–118
  3. Pindborg JJ. Pathology of the dental hard tissues. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1970;pp. 312–321
  4. Imfeld T. Dental erosion. Definition, classification and links. European Journal of Oral Science. 1996;104:151–155
  5. Smith BGN, Knight JK. An index for measuring tooth wear. British Dental Journal. 1984;156:435–438
  6. Lussi A. Dental erosion—clinical diagnosis and case history taking. European Journal of Oral Science. 1996;104:191–198
  7. O'Sullivan EA, Curzon MEJ. A new index for measurement of erosion in children (abstract). Caries Research. 1996;30:274
  8. Grenby TH. Methods of assessing erosion and erosive potential. European Journal of Oral Science. 1996;104:207–214
  9. Amaechi BT, Higham SM. Dental erosion: possible approaches to prevention and control. Journal of Dentistry. 2005;33:243–252
  10. Barbour ME, Rees JS. The laboratory assessment of enamel erosion: a review. Journal of Dentistry. 2004;32:591–602
  11. Eisenburger M, Hughes JA, West NX, Jandt KD, Addy M. Ultrasonication as a method to study enamel demineralization during acid dissolution. Caries Research. 2000;34:289–294
  12. Arends J, ten Bosch JJ. Demineralization and remineralisation evaluation techniques. Journal Dental Research. 1992;71:924–928
  13. Lussi A, Hellwig E. Erosive potential of oral care products. Caries Research. 2001;35:52–56
  14. Amaechi BT, Higham SM, Edgar WM. Factors influencing the development of dental erosion in vitro: enamel type, temperature and exposure time. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 1999;26:624–630
  15. Pretty IA, Edgar WM, Higham SM. The validation of quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) to quantify acid erosion of human enamel. Archives of Oral Biology. 2004;49:285–294
  16. Barbour ME, Finke M, Parker DM, Hughes JA, Allen GC, Addy M. The relationship between enamel softening and erosion caused by soft drinks at a range of temperatures. Journal of Dentistry. 2006;34:207–213
  17. Hall AF, Sadler JP, Strang R, Josselin De Jong E, Foye RH, Creanor SL. Application of transverse microradiography for measurement of mineral loss by acid erosion. Advances in Dental Research. 1997;11:420–425
  18. Azzopardi A, Bartlett DW, Watson TF, Sherriff M. The measurement and prevention of erosion and abrasion. Journal of Dentistry. 2001;29:395–400
  19. Amaechi BT, Higham SM, Edgar WM. The use of transverse microradiography to quantify mineral loss by erosion in bovine enamel. Caries Research. 1998;32(5):351–356
  20. Pretty IA, Hall AF, Smith PW, Edgar WM, Higham SM. The intra- and inter-examiner reliability of quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) analyses. British Dental Journal. 2002;193:105–109
  21. Davidson CL, Bomm G, Arends J. Calcium distribution in human and bovine surface enamel. Caries Research. 1973;7:349–359
  22. ten Bosch JJ, Angmar-Månsson B. Characterisation and validation of diagnostic methods. Monographs in Oral Science. 2000;17:174–189
  23. Eisenburger M, Addy M. Evaluation of pH and erosion time on demineralisation. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2001;5:108–111
  24. Ando M, Schemehorn BR, Eckert GJ, Zero DT, Stookey GK. Influence of enamel thickness on quantification of mineral loss in enamel using laser-induced fluorescence. Caries Research. 2003;37:24–28

PII: S0300-5712(09)00004-9

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.01.006

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 5 , Pages 336-341 , May 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution