Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 3 , Pages 198-203 , March 2009

A prospective randomized clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: Five-year results

  • P. Bottenberg

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +32 2 4774955; fax: +32 2 477 4942.
    • ,
  • W. Jacquet

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mathematics, Operational Research, Statistics, and Information Systems, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
    • ,
  • M. Alaerts

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
    • ,
  • F. Keulemans

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
    • Department of Dental Material Sciences, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, Louwesweg 1, 1066 EA Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Received 12 August 2008 ,Revised 10 November 2008 ,Accepted 15 November 2008.

References 

  1. Lynch CD, Shortall AC, Stewardson D, Tomson PL, Burke FJ. Teaching posterior composite resin restorations in the United Kingdom and Ireland: consensus views of teachers. British Dental Journal. 2007;203:183–187
  2. Rosin M, Steffen H, Konschake C, Greese U, Teichmann D, Hartmann A, et al. One-year evaluation of an ormocer restorative—a multipractice clinical trial. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2003;7:20–26
  3. Lopes LG, Cefaly DF, Franco EB, Mondelli RF, Lauris JR, Navarro MF. Clinical evaluation of two “packable” posterior composite resins: two-year results. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2003;7:123–128
  4. Kournetas N, Chakmakchi M, Kakaboura A, Rahiotis C, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Marginal and internal adaptation of class II ormocer and hybrid resin composite restorations before and after load cycling. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2004;8:123–129
  5. Bottenberg P, Alaerts M, Keulemans F. A prospective randomised clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: three-year results. Journal of Dentistry. 2007;35:163–171
  6. da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Cenci MS, Donassollo TA, Loguercio AD, Demarco FF. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings. Journal of Dentistry. 2006;34:427–435
  7. Pesun IJ, Olson AK, Hodges JS, Anderson GC. In vivo evaluation of the surface of posterior resin composite restorations: a pilot study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2000;84:353–359
  8. Prakki A, Cilli R, Saad JO, Rodrigues JR. Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of class II esthetic direct restorations. Quintessence International. 2004;35:785–789
  9. Oberlander H, Hiller KA, Thonemann B, Schmalz G. Clinical evaluation of packable composite resins in class-II restorations. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2001;5:102–107
  10. Rosin M, Schwahn C, Kordass B, Konschake C, Greese U, Teichmann D, et al. A multipractice clinical evaluation of an ORMOCER restorative—2-year results. Quintessence International. 2007;38:e306–e315
  11. Perdigao J, Geraldeli S, Hodges JS. Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: effect on postoperative sensitivity. Journal of the American Dental Association. 2003;134:1621–1629
  12. Janda R, Roulet JF, Kaminsky M, Steffin G, Latta M. Color stability of resin matrix restorative materials as a function of the method of light activation. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2004;112:280–285
  13. Opdam NJ, Roeters JJ, Joosten M, Veeke O. Porosities and voids in class I restorations placed by six operators using a packable or syringable composite. Dental Materials. 2002;18:58–63
  14. Leloup G, D’Hoore W, Bouter D, Degrange M, Vreven J. Meta-analytical review of factors involved in dentin adherence. Journal of Dental Research. 2001;80:1605–1614
  15. Plasmans PJ, Creugers NH, Mulder J. Long-term survival of extensive amalgam restorations. Journal of Dental Research. 1998;77:453–460
  16. Merte I, Schneider H, Merte K. Is it necessary to assess experimentally and clinically restorative materials already on the market?. Schweizer Monatschrift für Zahnmedizin. 2004;114:1124–1131
  17. Ernst CP, Martin M, Stuff S, Willershausen B. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for posterior teeth after 3 years. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2001;5:148–155
  18. Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl LA. A three-year clinical evaluation of two-bottle versus one-bottle dentin adhesives. Journal of the American Dental Association. 2005;136:311–322
  19. Brunthaler A, Konig F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2003;7:63–70
  20. Gorucu J, Ozgunaltay G. Fracture strength of class II slot cavities restored with polymerizable restorative materials. Polymers for Advanced Technologies. 2003;14:586–591
  21. Yap AU, Tan CH, Chung SM. Wear behavior of new composite restoratives. Operative Dentistry. 2004;29:269–274
  22. Manhart J, Garcia-Godoy F, Hickel R. Direct posterior restorations: clinical results and new developments. Dental Clinics of North America. 2002;46:303–339
  23. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. Journal of Dental Research. 2005;84:118–132
  24. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dental Materials. 2005;21:864–881
  25. Nikaido T, Takada T, Kitasako Y, Ogata M, Shimada Y, Yoshikawa T, et al. Retrospective study of five-year clinical performance of direct composite restorations using a self-etching primer adhesive system. Dental Materials Journal. 2006;25:611–615
  26. Van Nieuwenhuysen JP, D’Hoore W, Carvalho J, Qvist V. Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. Journal of Dentistry. 2003;31:395–405
  27. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Dental Materials. 2007;23:2–8
  28. Ryge G, Snyder M. Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. Journal of the American Dental Association. 1973;87:369–377
  29. Hayashi M, Wilson NH, Watts DC. Quality of marginal adaptation evaluation of posterior composites in clinical trials. Journal of Dental Research. 2003;82:59–63
  30. Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2007;11:5–33

PII: S0300-5712(08)00308-4

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.11.011

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 3 , Pages 198-203 , March 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution