Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 3 , Pages 177-184, March 2009

Quantification of monomer elution and carbon–carbon double bonds in dental adhesive systems using HPLC and micro-Raman spectroscopy

  • Vesna Miletic

      Affiliations

    • Edinburgh Postgraduate Dental Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Lauriston Building (4th floor), Lauriston Place, Edinburgh EH3 9HA, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 7748572850; fax: +44 1315364971.
  • ,
  • Ario Santini

      Affiliations

    • Edinburgh Postgraduate Dental Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Lauriston Building (4th floor), Lauriston Place, Edinburgh EH3 9HA, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Ivan Trkulja

      Affiliations

    • School of Chemistry, The University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JJ, United Kingdom

Received 22 August 2008; received in revised form 8 November 2008; accepted 12 November 2008.

Abstract 

Objectives

To quantify monomer elution from different adhesive systems using reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and correlate this elution with the ratio of carbon–carbon double bonds from monomer to polymer (RDB) obtained using micro-Raman spectroscopy.

Methods

Thirty dentine discs were cut from 30 human, intact, third molars and randomly allocated to five groups according to the adhesive applied: total-etch, Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent), two-bottle self-etch, Clearfil SE (Kuraray), one-bottle self-etch, Clearfil 3S (Kuraray), ormocer-based, Admira (Voco) and Filtek Silorane adhesive system (FS) (3M ESPE). Monomer elution was studied 1h, 6h, 24h, 96h and 7 days after immersion in 75% ethanol/water. The RDB was calculated immediately after light-curing and thereafter at 24h and 7 days. The data were statistically analysed using one-way ANOVA and Pearson's correlation coefficient (p<0.05).

Results

More than 90% of the whole elution occurred during the first 1h, except for BisGMA in FS, with the highest absolute amount from Clearfil SE and the highest wt% from Admira. Initial RDB was in the ascending order FS<Admira<Excite<Clearfil SE<Clearfil 3S. In all groups, the RDB was significantly higher after 24h and 7 days than immediately after light-curing (p<0.05). Negative correlation was found only for the elution of HEMA and the RDB of Clearfil 3S.

Conclusions

Different adhesive systems showed different monomer elution kinetics. In all systems, the RDB increased after monomer elution. Overall, no direct correlation exists between the RDB of adhesives and the elution of unreacted monomers.

Keywords: Adhesive, Monomer, Elution, HPLC, Degree of conversion, Raman, Dimethacrylate, Ormocer, Silorane

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(08)00302-3

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2008.11.006

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 3 , Pages 177-184, March 2009