Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 1 , Pages 65-75, January 2009

Quantification of all-ceramic crown margin surface profile from try-in to 1-week post-cementation

  • Melissa-L. Good

      Affiliations

    • Health and Healthcare Research Group, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen’s University Belfast, Grosvenor Rd., Belfast BT12 6BP, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 28 9063 4262; fax: +44 28 9043 8861.
  • ,
  • Christina A. Mitchell

      Affiliations

    • Health and Healthcare Research Group, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen’s University Belfast, Grosvenor Rd., Belfast BT12 6BP, UK
  • ,
  • Maria R. Pintado

      Affiliations

    • School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
  • ,
  • William H. Douglas

      Affiliations

    • School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America

Received 2 June 2008; received in revised form 19 September 2008; accepted 19 September 2008.

Abstract 

Objectives

To use profilometry to assess the margin surface profile of all-ceramic crowns (ACC’s) at try-in and 1-week after cementation with dual-cured resin (DC, RelyX ARC, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), self-adhesive dual-cured resin (SADC, RelyX Unicem, 3M ESPE), light-cured resin (LC, RelyX Veneer, 3M ESPE) or chemically cured resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI, RelyX Luting Plus, 3M ESPE) luting cement.

Methods

Forty, sound, extracted, human, premolar teeth underwent a standardised preparation for ACC’s. IPS Empress (Ivoclar-Vivadent, Liechtenstein) crowns of standard dimensions were fabricated and 10 luted with each cement and stored in water for 7 days. Three groups of serial profiles were taken, the first of the tooth preparation, the second of the crown margins at try-in and lastly of the crown margins after cementation and 7 days water storage.

Results

There were no significant differences in the crown margin surface profile between the four cement groups at try-in. The change in crown margin position between try-in and post-cementation was significantly greater for DC than for LC and RMGI. SADC was not significantly different to the other cements. There were no significant differences in the crown margin extensions between the four cement groups, however most of the IPS Empress ACC’s in this study were underextended but this was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

IPS Empress ACC’s seated more fully with LC and RMGI than with DC cement.

Keywords: All-ceramic crowns, Luting cements, Resin cements, Resin-modified glass ionomer cements, Profilometry, Marginal fit, Water storage

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(08)00262-5

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2008.09.011

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 1 , Pages 65-75, January 2009