Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 3 , Pages 167-176, March 2009

Assessing fluoride treatment and resistance of dental enamel to soft drink erosion in vitro: Applications of focus variation 3D scanning microscopy and stylus profilometry

  • Yan-Fang Ren

      Affiliations

    • University of Rochester Eastman Dental Center, 625 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14620, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 585 273 5588.
  • ,
  • Qiongzhi Zhao

      Affiliations

    • University of Rochester Eastman Dental Center, 625 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14620, USA
  • ,
  • Hans Malmstrom

      Affiliations

    • University of Rochester Eastman Dental Center, 625 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14620, USA
  • ,
  • Virginia Barnes

      Affiliations

    • Colgate Palmolive Technology Center, Piscataway, NJ, USA
  • ,
  • Tao Xu

      Affiliations

    • Colgate Palmolive Technology Center, Piscataway, NJ, USA

Received 18 July 2008; received in revised form 13 September 2008; accepted 15 September 2008.

Abstract 

Objectives

This study assesses the application of the focus variation 3D microscopy for the evaluation of dental erosion and fluoride treatment for prevention of enamel erosion in vitro.

Methods

Human dental enamel disks were treated with Prevident 5000® (PV, n=15) for 1 week and compared with a reference group (PN, n=15) after orange juice erosion in vitro. A focus variation 3D scanning microscope (IFM) and a stylus type profilometer (SSP) were used to evaluate the erosion depths on enamel. 3D topographic images were taken with vertical resolutions of 0.1 and 0.02μm. Scratch marks depths from SSP were measured on IFM images. Measurements were compared between the SSP and IFM and between the two study groups.

Results

The SSP and IFM measurements of eroded enamel surfaces showed similar trends between the two methods and between the two study groups. The SSP and the IFM measurements were statistically significantly different but correlated with each other. PV group showed consistently lower erosion depth than PN in all profile measures using both SSP and IFM. The stylus tip created scratch marks that were significantly different in depths between the eroded and the reference surfaces in both groups.

Conclusions

The focus variation 3D microscopy is a powerful tool in evaluating surface topography associated with enamel erosion and in assessing the treatment effects of anti-erosive therapies. Topical treatment with Prevident 5000® significantly increased enamel resistance to erosion by orange juice and should be considered as a treatment choice in patients susceptible to acidic dental erosion.

Keywords: Tooth erosion, Enamel, 3D microscopy, Profilometry, Beverages, Orange juice, Fluoride therapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(08)00261-3

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2008.09.008

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 3 , Pages 167-176, March 2009