Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 1 , Pages 59-64, January 2009

Dentin and enamel bond strengths of dual-cure composite luting agents used with dual-cure dental adhesives

  • André V. Ritter

      Affiliations

    • Department of Operative Dentistry, UNC Chapel Hill, School of Dentistry, 441 Brauer Hall, CB#7450, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7450, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 919 843 6356; fax: +1 919 966 5660.
  • ,
  • Eduardo Ghaname

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences, and Endodontics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
  • ,
  • Luiz A.F. Pimenta

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Ecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States

Received 28 July 2008; received in revised form 4 September 2008; accepted 8 September 2008.

Abstract 

Objective

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare dentin and enamel bond strengths obtained with dual-cure composite luting agents when used with dual-cure dental adhesives.

Methods

Human molars were ground flat to expose enamel (n=80) or dentin (n=80). Specimens in each substrate group were randomly assigned to eight treatment sub-groups, according to four adhesive-luting agent combinations and two test conditions (with or without thermocycling). Pre-polymerized composite resin posts (TPH Spectrum) were luted to either the enamel or dentin surfaces with one of the following adhesive-luting agent combinations: (1) Xeno IV Dual Cure (dual-cure self-etch adhesive) and Calibra (dual-cure luting agent); (2) Prime & Bond NT Dual Cure (dual-cure total-etch adhesive) and Calibra; (3) OptiBond All-in-One Dual Cure (dual-cure self-etch adhesive) and Nexus 2 Dual Syringe (dual-cure luting agent); (4) OptiBond Solo Plus Dual Cure (dual-cure total-etch adhesive) and Nexus 2 Dual Syringe. For each treatment sub-group, half the specimens (n=10) were tested after 24h storage in water at 37°C, and the other half (n=10) were tested after thermocycling for 1800 cycles between water baths held at 5 and 55°C, with a dwell time in each bath of 30s, and a transfer time of 10s. Bond strengths were measured in shear mode, and expressed in MPa. The fracture mode (adhesive, cohesive, mixed) was examined. Data were analyzed for statistical significance with a factorial ANOVA and post hoc tests.

Results

Mean enamel bond strengths ranged from 8.4MPa for non-thermocycled OptiBond All-in-One|Nexus 2 to 35.5MPa for non-thermocycled Prime & Bond NT|Calibra. Mean dentin bond strengths ranged from 14.5MPa for non-thermocycled OptiBond Solo Plus|Nexus 2 to 30.9MPa for thermocycled Xeno IV|Calibra. The fracture mode was predominantly adhesive for all groups.

Conclusions

On enamel, the total-etch adhesives performed better than their self-etch counterparts, while in dentin, the opposite was found, i.e., the self-etch adhesives performed better than their total-etch counterparts. Thermocycling for 1800 cycles did not affect the SBS of the materials tested to dentin and enamel.

Keywords: Dual-cure, Luting agents, Shear bond strengths

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was funded by Dentsply/Caulk, Milford, DE, USA.

PII: S0300-5712(08)00260-1

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2008.09.006

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 1 , Pages 59-64, January 2009