Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 1 , Pages 52-58, January 2009

In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses

  • Raquel Castillo Oyagüe

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University Complutense of Madrid, UCM, Avda. Complutense s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +34 607367903; fax: +34 947506610.
  • ,
  • Andrés Sánchez Turrión

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University Complutense of Madrid, UCM, 28040 Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Manuel Toledano

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
  • ,
  • Francesca Monticelli

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 22006 Huesca, Spain
  • ,
  • Raquel Osorio

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain

Received 7 July 2008; received in revised form 5 September 2008; accepted 8 September 2008.

Abstract 

Objectives

To evaluate the influence of the alloy type and the associated investing and casting techniques, on the marginal adaptation of bridge structures luted onto prefabricated implant abutments.

Methods

Thirty frameworks for three-unit posterior-lower bridges were waxed and cast (10 of cobalt–chromium, 10 of titanium and 10 of palladium–gold). Each structure was cemented onto two prefabricated implant abutments with a special clamp designed to maintain constant seating pressure. The vertical discrepancy around the abutments’ margins was assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). One-way ANOVA for independent samples and Scheffe’s test were applied to analyze the effect of the alloy type and its recommended investing and casting system on vertical misfit. Student’s t-test for independent samples was used to compare misfit values concerning the abutment design (premolar and molar). The significance level was set at α=0.05.

Results

Cobalt–chromium samples recorded the greatest vertical discrepancies, revealing significant differences with respect to both titanium and palladium–gold structures (p<0.0001). Vertical gaps of the palladium–gold and the titanium casts were not significantly different (p=0.292). Neither statistically significant differences were found between the anterior and posterior abutments’ vertical misfit independently from the alloy type and nor within each group of alloys tested (p>0.05).

Conclusions

The vertical fit of the frameworks cast for implant-cemented bridges was influenced by the alloy type and the investing and casting methods. The marginal discrepancy of the three tested alloys could be considered clinically acceptable. A polished technique in the management of titanium could optimize the accuracy of this cast frameworks.

Keywords: Dental alloy, Cobalt–chromium, Titanium, Palladium–gold, Cement-retained prostheses, Implant-fixed partial prostheses, Cast restoration, Dental framework, Implant-fixed structure, Vertical misfit

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(08)00259-5

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2008.09.007

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 1 , Pages 52-58, January 2009