Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 12 , Pages 1025-1032, December 2008

The effect of several dentin desensitizers on shear bond strength of adhesive resin luting cement using self-etching primer

  • Jung-Bo Huh

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prodthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 134 Sinchon-dong, Seodaemum-gu, Seoul 120-752, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Jee-Hwan Kim

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prodthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 134 Sinchon-dong, Seodaemum-gu, Seoul 120-752, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Moon-Kyu Chung

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prodthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 134 Sinchon-dong, Seodaemum-gu, Seoul 120-752, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Ho-yong Lee

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prodthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 134 Sinchon-dong, Seodaemum-gu, Seoul 120-752, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Yong-Geun Choi

      Affiliations

    • Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University, 126-1, 5-ka, Anam-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 136-705, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • June-Sung Shim

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prodthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 134 Sinchon-dong, Seodaemum-gu, Seoul 120-752, Republic of Korea
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +82 2 2228 8713; fax: +82 2 312-3598.

Received 20 May 2008; received in revised form 25 August 2008; accepted 27 August 2008.

Abstract 

Objectives

Dentin desensitizers can inhibit the bonding between dentin and resin cements. This study examined the effect of the previous application of desensitizers on the shear bond strength of one resin cement using self-etching primer to dentin.

Materials and methods

One hundred and twenty-five dentin exposed teeth were randomly assigned to four experimental groups and one control group of 25 teeth each. Four dentin desensitizers were applied to the four experimental groups, respectively. The dentin desensitizers used were SuperSeal® (Phoenix Dental, Inc., USA), MS-Coat® (Sun Medical Co. Ltd, Japan), Gluma® (Heraeus Kulzer, Germany), and Copalite Varnish® (Cooley & Cooley Ltd, USA). Panavia F (Kuraray Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) was attached to the top of each experimental and control group teeth using an Ultradent testing jig (Ultradent Product, Inc., Utah, USA), and the shear bond strength was measured using a Universal testing machine (Model 6022, Instron Co., Canton, MA, USA). The tooth surface was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-T2000, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).

Results

The control group showed the greatest shear bond strength (14.74MPa) followed by SuperSeal® (12.33MPa), Gluma® (5.28MPa), MS-Coat® (4.44MPa) and Copalite Varnish™ (3.14MPa). There was no significant difference in shear bond strength between the control group and the experimental group treated with Superseal®. The shear bond strength in the other experimental groups treated with Gluma®, Varnish®, and MS-Coat® was similar to each other but significantly lower than control or Superseal®. SEM showed revealed resin tags in most of the dentinal tubules in the experimental group treated with the Superseal®.

Conclusion

Among the four dentin desensitizers, Superseal® was the only one that did not interfere with the process of resin bonding. The other dentin desensitizers that contained a resin ingredient interfered with resin retention.

Keywords: Dentin desensitizer, Bonding strength, Resin cement

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(08)00251-0

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2008.08.012

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 12 , Pages 1025-1032, December 2008