Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 12 , Pages 1013-1024 , December 2008

Dentine bonding after CPP-ACP paste treatment with and without conditioning

Received 21 April 2008 ,Revised 15 August 2008 ,Accepted 26 August 2008.

References 

  1. Vanuspong W, Eisenburger M, Addy M. Cervical tooth wear and sensitivity: erosion, softening and rehardening of dentine; effects of pH, time and ultrasonication. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2002;29:351–357
  2. Non-carious cervical lesions. Operative Dentistry. 2003;28:109–113
  3. Sulieman M. An overview of bleaching techniques: 2. Night guard vital bleaching and non-vital bleaching. Dental Update. 2005;32:39–40
  4. Geiger S, Matalon S, Blasbalg J, Tung M, Eichmiller FC. The clinical effect of amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) on root surface hypersensitivity. Operative Dentistry. 2003;28:496–500
  5. Reynolds EC. Anticariogenic complexes of amorphous calcium phosphate stabilized by casein phosphopeptides: a review. Special Care in Dentistry. 1998;18:8–16
  6. Reynolds EC. Remineralization of enamel subsurface lesions by casein phosphopeptide-stabilized calcium phosphate solutions. Journal of Dental Research. 1997;76:1587–1595
  7. Ramalingam L, Messer LB, Reynolds EC. Adding casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate to sports drinks to eliminate in vitro erosion. Pediatric Dentistry. 2005;27:61–67
  8. Oshiro M, Yamaguchi K, Takamizawa T, Inage H, Watanabe T, Irokawa A, et al. Effect of CPP-ACP paste on tooth mineralization: an FE-SEM study. Journal of Oral Science. 2007;49:115–120
  9. Yamaguchi K, Miyazaki M, Takamizawa T, Inage H, Kurokawa H. Ultrasonic determination of the effect of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate paste on the demineralization of bovine dentin. Caries Research. 2007;41:204–207
  10. Rahiotis C, Vougiouklakis G. Effect of a CPP-ACP agent on the demineralization and remineralization of dentine in vitro. Journal of Dentistry. 2007;35:695–698
  11. Sidhu SK, Omata Y, Tanaka T, Koshiro K, Spreafico D, Semeraro S, et al. Bonding characteristics of newly developed all-in-one adhesives. Journal Of Biomedical Materials Research Part B-Applied Biomaterials. 2007;80B:297–303
  12. Knobloch LA, Gailey D, Azer S, Johnston WM, Clelland N, Kerby RE. Bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesive systems. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2007;97:216–222
  13. Peumans M, Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2005;113:512–518
  14. Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. Operative Dentistry. 2007;32:11–15
  15. Perdigao J, Gomes G, Gondo R, Fundingsland JW. In vitro bonding performance of all-in-one adhesives. Part I—microtensile bond strengths. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2006;8:367–373
  16. Adebayo OA, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Effects of conditioners on microshear bond strength to enamel after carbamide peroxide bleaching and/or casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) treatment. Journal of Dentistry. 2007;35:862–870
  17. Pashley DH. Smear layer: physiological considerations. Operative Dentistry Supplement. 1984;3:13–29
  18. Brannstrom M, Johnson G. Effects of various conditioners and cleaning agents on prepared dentin surfaces: a scanning electron microscopic investigation. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1974;31:422–430
  19. Tani C, Finger WJ. Effect of smear layer thickness on bond strength mediated by three all-in-one self-etching priming adhesives. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2002;4:283–289
  20. Oliveira SSA, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, Watanabe LG, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system. Dental Materials. 2003;19:758–767
  21. Koibuchi H, Yasuda N, Nakabayashi N. Bonding to dentin with a self-etching primer: the effect of smear layers. Dental Materials. 2001;17:122–126
  22. Tay FR, Carvalho R, Sano H, Pashley DH. Effect of smear layers on the bonding of a self-etching primer to dentin. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2000;2:99–116
  23. Schulein TM. The smear layer on dentin. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. American Journal of Dentistry. 1988;1:264–270
  24. Rimondini L, Baroni C, Carrassi A. Ultrastructure of hypersensitive and non-sensitive dentin—a study of replica models. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1995;22:899–902
  25. Absi EG, Addy M, Adams D. Dentin hypersensitivity—a study of the patency of dentinal tubules in sensitive and non-sensitive cervical dentin. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1987;14:280–284
  26. Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art, 1995. Quintessence International. 1995;26:95–110
  27. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM. Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion. Journal of Dentistry. 1997;25:355–372
  28. Tyas MJ. The Class V lesion—aetiology and restoration. Australian Dental Journal. 1995;40:167–170
  29. Osborne-Smith KL, Burke FJT, Wilson NHF. The aetiology of the non-carious cervical lesion. International Dental Journal. 1999;49:139–152
  30. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. Journal of Dental Research. 2004;83:454–458
  31. Adebayo OA, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Bonding of one-step and two-step self-etching primer adhesives to dentin with different tubule orientations. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2008;66:159–168
  32. Marshall GW, Marshall SJ, Kinney JH, Balooch M. The dentin substrate: structure and properties related to bonding. Journal of Dentistry. 1997;25:441–458
  33. Van Landuyt KL, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching. Journal of Dentistry. 2006;34:77–85
  34. Foong J, Lee K, Nguyen C, Tang G, Austin D, Ch’ng C, et al. Comparison of microshear bond strengths of four self-etching bonding systems to enamel using two test methods. Australian Dental Journal. 2006;51:252–257
  35. Finger WJ, Shao B, Hoffmann M, Kanehira M, Endo T, Komatsu M. Does application of phase-separated self-etching adhesives affect bond strength?. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2007;9:169–173
  36. Sattabanasuk V, Vachiramon V, Qian F, Armstrong SR. Resin-dentin bond strength as related to different surface preparation methods. Journal of Dentistry. 2007;35:467–475
  37. Tantbirojn D, Huang A, Ericson MD, Poolthong S. Change in surface hardness of enamel by a cola drink and a CPP-ACP paste. Journal of Dentistry. 2008;36:74–79
  38. Cagidiaco MC, Ferrari M, Vichi A, Davidson CL. Mapping of tubule and intertubule surface areas available for bonding in Class V and Class II preparations. Journal of Dentistry. 1997;25:379–389
  39. Nezu T, Winnik FM. Interaction of water-soluble collagen with poly(acrylic acid). Biomaterials. 2000;21:415–419
  40. Es-Souni M, Fischer-Brandies H, Zaporojshenko V, Es-Souni M. On the interaction of polyacrylic acid as a conditioning agent with bovine enamel. Biomaterials. 2002;23:2871–2878
  41. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Effect of polyacrylic-acid treatment of dentine on adhesion of glass ionomer cement. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1990;48:337–341
  42. Tay FR, Smales RJ, Ngo H, Wei SH, Pashley DH. Effect of different conditioning protocols on adhesion of a GIC to dentin. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2001;3:153–167
  43. Kanehira M, Finger WJ, Hoffmann M, Endo T, Komatsu M. Relationship between degree of polymerization and enamel bonding strength with self-etching adhesives. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2006;8:211–216
  44. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dental Materials. 1998;14:212–221

PII: S0300-5712(08)00250-9

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.08.011

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 12 , Pages 1013-1024 , December 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution