Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 1 , Pages 39-43 , January 2009

Re-intervention in glass ionomer restorations: What comes next?

  • F.J.T. Burke

      Affiliations

    • Primary Dental Care Research Group, University of Birmingham School of Dentistry, St. Chad’s Queensway, Birmingham B4 6NN, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 121 237 2767; fax: +44 121 625 8815.
    • ,
  • P.S.K. Lucarotti

      Affiliations

    • NHS Business Services Authority (Dental Division), Eastbourne, Sussex BN20 8AD, UK

Received 21 December 2007 ,Revised 1 July 2008 ,Accepted 14 July 2008.

References 

  1. Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. British Dental Journal. 1972;132:133–135
  2. Digest of statistics. Dental Practice Board, Eastbourne, UK; 2004.
  3. Randall RC, Wilson NHF. Glass ionomer restoratives: a systematic review of a secondary caries treatment effect. Journal of Dental Research. 1999;78:628–637
  4. Combe EC, Burke FJT, Douglas WH. Clinical dental materials. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1999;
  5. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Resin modified glass ionomer materials. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. American Journal of Dentistry. 1995;8:59–67
  6. Kao EC, Rezvan E, Johnson WM. Microhardness as an indicator for finishing time in ionomer restorations. Journal of Dental Research. 1994;73:220, Abstract No. 945
  7. Momoi Y, Hirosaki K, Kohno A, McCabe JF. In vitro toothbrush-dentrifice abrasion of resin-modified glass ionomers. Dental Materials. 1997;82–88
  8. Dentsply De Trey GmbH Professional Research. Chemflex technical manual. Dentsply De Trey, Germany; 1998, p. 25.
  9. www 3MESPE Ketac Molar Quick Product Brochure.
  10. Buck D, Newton JT. The privatisation of NHS dentistry? A national snapshot of general dental practitioners. British Dental Journal. 2001;190:115–118
  11. Lucarotti PSK, Holder RL, Burke FJT. Analysis of an administrative database of half a million restorations over 11 years. Journal of Dentistry. 2005;33:791–803
  12. Lucarotti PSK, Holder RL, Burke FJT. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales. Part 1. Variation by type of restoration and re-intervention. Journal of Dentistry. 2005;33:805–815
  13. Strategic Dental Marketing, 340 West Passaic Street, 1st Floor Rochelle Park, NJ 07662, USA.
  14. Robinson AD. The life of a filling. British Dental Journal. 1971;130:206–208
  15. Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Cheung S-W, Mjor IA. Influence of method of funding on the age of failed restorations in general dental practice in the UK. British Dental Journal. 2002;192:699–702
  16. Hassan MA, Watson TF. Conventional glass ionomers as posterior restorations. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. American Journal of Dentistry. 1998;11:36–45

PII: S0300-5712(08)00211-X

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.07.008

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 1 , Pages 39-43 , January 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution