Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 11 , Pages 885-891 , November 2008

SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing

  • Elisa Magni

      Affiliations

    • Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, University of Siena, Policlinico “Le Scotte”, Viale Bracci, 53100, Siena, Italy
    • ,
  • Ling Zhang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthodontics, Stomatological College, Fourth Military Medical University, No. 145, Changlexi Road, 710032, Xi’an, China
    • ,
  • Reinhard Hickel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry and Periodontology, Dental School of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Goethestrasse 70, 80336, Munich, Germany
    • ,
  • Maurizio Bossù

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University “La Sapienza”, Policlinico “Umberto I”, Viale Regina Elena 287/A, 00161, Rome, Italy
    • ,
  • Antonella Polimeni

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University “La Sapienza”, Policlinico “Umberto I”, Viale Regina Elena 287/A, 00161, Rome, Italy
    • ,
  • Marco Ferrari

      Affiliations

    • Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, University of Siena, Policlinico “Le Scotte”, Viale Bracci, 53100, Siena, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +39 0577233131; fax: +39 0577233117.

Received 9 June 2008 ,Revised 8 July 2008 ,Accepted 9 July 2008.

References 

  1. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dental Materials. 2005;21:864–881
  2. Hickel R, Dasch W, Janda R, Tyas M, Anusavice K. New direct restorative materials. FDI Commission Project. International Dental Journal. 1998;48:3–16
  3. Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. Adhesive restorative materials: a review. Australian Dental Journal. 2004;49:112–121
  4. Croll TP, Nicholson JW. Glass ionomer cements in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature. Pediatric Dentistry. 2002;24:423–429
  5. Berg JH. Glass ionomer cements. Pediatric Dentistry. 2002;24:430–438
  6. Rutar J, McAllan L, Tyas MJ. Three-year clinical performance of glass ionomer cement in primary molars. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2002;12:146–147
  7. Taifour D, Frencken JE, Beiruti N, van’t Hof MA, Truin GJ. Effectiveness of glass-ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: results after 3 years. Caries Research. 2002;36:437–444
  8. Scott JM, Mahoney EK. Restoring proximal lesions in the primary dentition: is glass ionomer cement the material of choice?. New Zealand Dental Journal. 2003;99:65–71
  9. Nikolaos K, Vassiliki T, Christine T, Eirini T. The early fluoride release pattern of an aged glass ionomer treated with fluoride. European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2007;15:135–141
  10. Davidovich E, Weiss E, Fuks AB, Beyth N. Surface antibacterial properties of glass ionomer cements used in atraumatic restorative treatment. Journal of the American Dental Association. 2007;138:1347–1352
  11. Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dentistry: rationale of cavity design. Operative Dentistry. 2003;28:92–99
  12. Noack MJ, Wicht MJ, Haak R. Lesion orientated caries treatment—a classification of carious dentin treatment procedures. Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry. 2004;2:301–306
  13. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD, Hackenitz E. 3-year results of ART restorations and GI sealants. Journal of Dental Research. 1998;77:1279
  14. Edelberg MH, Basso ML. Atraumatic restorative treatment – three years clinical evaluation. Journal of Dental Research. 1999;78:368
  15. Ho TF, Smales RJ, Fang DT. A 2-year clinical study of two glass ionomer cements used in the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 1999;27:195–201
  16. Lo EC, Luo Y, Fan MW, Wei SH. Clinical investigation of two glass-ionomer restoratives used with the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in China: two-years results. Caries Research. 2001;35:458–463
  17. Taifour D, Frencken JE, Beiruti N, Van’t Hof MA, Truin GJ, Van Palenstein Helderman WH. Three-year survival of ART and amalgam restorations in permanent dentitions. Journal of Dental Research. 2003;82:C498
  18. Frencken JE, Taifour D, van ′t Hof MA. Survival of ART and amalgam restorations in permanent teeth of children after 6.3 years. Journal of Dental Research. 2006;85:622–626
  19. Papacchini F, Cury AH, Goracci C, Chieffi N, Tay FR, Polimeni A, et al. Noninvasive pit and fissure sealing: microtensile bond strength to intact bovine enamel of different pit and fissure sealants in a simplified fissure model. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2006;8:375–380
  20. Papacchini F, Goracci C, Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Garcia-Godoy F, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength to ground enamel by glass-ionomers, resin-modified glass-ionomers, and resin composites used as pit and fissure sealants. Journal of Dentistry. 2005;33:459–467
  21. Loguercio AD, Alessandra R, Mazzocco KC, Dias AL, Busato AL, Singer Jda M, et al. Microleakage in class II composite resin restorations: total bonding and open sandwich technique. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2002;4:137–144
  22. De C, Luz MA, Ciaramicoli-Rodrigues MT, Garone Netto N, De Lima AC. Long-term clinical evaluation of fracture and pulp injury following glass-ionomer cement or composite resin applied as a base filling in teeth restored with amalgam. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2001;28:634–639
  23. Liebenberg W. Return to the resin-modified glass-ionomer cement sandwich technique. International Dentistry South Africa. 2006;8:6–10
  24. Bayindir YZ, Bayindir F, Akyil SM. Bond strength of permanent cements in cementing cast to crown different core build-up materials. Dental Materials Journal. 2004;23:117–120
  25. Farrrell CV, Johnson GH, Oswald MT, Tucker RD. Effect of cement selection and finishing technique on marginal opening of cast gold inlays. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2008;99:287–292
  26. Johnson GH, Hazelton LR, Bales DJ, Lepe X. The effect of a resin-based sealer on crown retention for three types of cement. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2004;91:428–435
  27. Youn YA, Lee YK, Lee DY, Kim NY, Lim YK. Effect of surface treatment and type of cement on the retentive strength of orthodontic bands on gold alloy crowns. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2007;132:728. e1-6
  28. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. Journal of Dental Research. 2005;84:118–132
  29. Hickel R, Manhart J, García-Godoy F. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations. American Journal of Dentistry. 2000;13:41D–54D
  30. Manhart J, García-Godoy F, Hickel R. Direct posterior restorations: clinical results and new developments. Dental Clinics of North America. 2002;46:303–339
  31. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2001;3:45–64
  32. Hickel R, Kaaden C, Paschos E, Buerkle V, García-Godoy F, Manhart J. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth. American Journal of Dentistry. 2005;18:198–211
  33. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore memorial lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Operative Dentistry. 2004;29:481–508
  34. Owens BM, Johnson WW. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of class V resin composite restorations. Operative Dentistry. 2006;31:481–488
  35. Mazzaoui SA, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Fluoride release from glass ionomer cements and resin composites coated with a dentin adhesive. Dental Materials. 2000;16:166–171
  36. Castro GW, Gray SE, Buikema DJ, Reagan SE. The effect of various surface coatings on fluoride release from glass-ionomer cement. Operative Dentistry. 1994;19:194–198
  37. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. Journal of the American Dental Association. 1998;129:567–577
  38. Frankenberger R, Lopes M, Perdigão J, Ambrose WW, Rosa BT. The use of flowable composites as filled adhesives. Dental Materials. 2002;18:227–238
  39. Yip HK, Tay FR, Ngo HC, Smales RJ, Pashley DH. Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to dentin. Dental Materials. 2001;17:456–470
  40. Knight GM, McIntyre JM, Craig GG, Mulyani , Zilm PS, Gully NJ. An in vitro investigation of marginal dentine caries abutting composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations. Australian Dental Journal. 2007;52:187–192
  41. Castro A, Feigal RE. Microleakage of a new improved glass ionomer restorative material in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatric Dentistry. 2002;24:23–28
  42. Atash R, Bottenberg P, Petein M, Vanden Abbeele A. In vitro evaluation of the marginal seal of four restoration materials on deciduous molars. Bulletin du Groupement International Pour la Recherche Scientifique en Stomatologie et Odontologie. 2003;45:34–41
  43. Wadenya R, Mante FK. An in vitro comparison of marginal microleakage of alternative restorative treatment and conventional glass ionomer restorations in extracted permanent molars. Pediatric Dentistry. 2007;29:303–307
  44. Irie M, Tjandrawinata R, Suzuki K. Effect of delayed polishing periods on interfacial gap formation of class V restorations. Operative Dentistry. 2003;28:552–559
  45. Koupis NS, Marks LA, Verbeeck RM, Martens LC. Review: finishing and polishing procedures of (resin-modified) glass ionomers and compomers in paediatric dentistry. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2007;8:22–28

PII: S0300-5712(08)00209-1

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.07.003

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 11 , Pages 885-891 , November 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution