Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 10 , Pages 833-839 , October 2008

The influence of 30-day-old Streptococcus mutans biofilm on the surface of esthetic restorative materials—An in vitro study

  • Suzana B.P. Fúcio

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Material Area, Faculty of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Postal Code 52, São Paulo Brazil
  • ,
  • Fabíola G. Carvalho

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Material Area, Faculty of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Postal Code 52, São Paulo Brazil
  • ,
  • Lourenço Correr Sobrinho

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Material Area, Faculty of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Postal Code 52, São Paulo Brazil
  • ,
  • Mário A.C. Sinhoreti

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Material Area, Faculty of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Postal Code 52, São Paulo Brazil
  • ,
  • Regina M. Puppin-Rontani

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Postal Code 52, São Paulo, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Pediatric Dentistry Area, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP, Av. Limeira 901, 13414-900 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. Tel.: +55 19 2106 5286; fax: +55 19 2106 5218.

Received 5 March 2008 ,Revised 5 June 2008 ,Accepted 5 June 2008.

References 

  1. Asmussen E. Softening of BISGMA-based polymers by ethanol and by organic acids of plaque. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research. 1984;92:257–261
  2. Yap AUJ, Low JS, Ong LFKL. Effect of food-simulating liquids on surface characteristics of composite and polyacid-modified composite restoratives. Operative Dentistry. 2000;25:170–176
  3. Turssi CP, Hara AT, Serra MC, Rodrigues AL. Effect of storage media upon the surface micromorphology of resin-based restorative materials. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2002;29:864–871
  4. Yap AUJ, Lim LY, Yang TY, Ali A, Chung SM. Influence of dietary solvents on strength of nanofill and ormocer composites. Operative Dentistry. 2005;30:129–133
  5. Forss H, Jokinen J, Spets-Happonen S, Seppä L, Luoma H. Fluoride and mutans streptococci in plaque grown on glass ionomer and composite. Caries Research. 1991;25:454–458
  6. Willershausen B, Callaway A, Ernst C-P, Stender E. The influence of oral bacteria on the surfaces of resin-based dental restorative materials—an in vitro study. International Dental Journal. 1999;49:231–239
  7. McKenzie MA, Linden RWA, Nicholson JW. The physical properties of conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer dental cements stored in saliva, proprietary acidic beverages, saline and water. Biomaterials. 2003;24:4063–4069
  8. Badra VV, Faraoni JJ, Ramos RP, Palma-Dibb RG. Influence of different beverages on the microhardness and surface roughness of resin composites. Operative Dentistry. 2005;30:213–219
  9. Finer Y, Santerre JP. The influence of resin chemistry on a dental composite's biodegradation. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 2004;69A:233–246
  10. Hamada S, Slade HD. Biology, immunology and cariogenicity of Streptococcus mutans. Microbiological Reviews. 1980;44:331–384
  11. Auschill TM, Arweiler NB, Brecx M, Reich E, Sculean A, Netuschil L. The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2002;110:48–53
  12. Eick S, Glockmann E, Brandl B, Pfister W. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to various restorative materials in a continuous flow system. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2004;31:278–285
  13. Quance SC, Shortall AC, Harrington E, Lumley PJ. Effect of exposure intensity and post-cure temperature storage on hardness of contemporary photo-activated composites. Journal of Dentistry. 2001;29:553–560
  14. Brosh T, Ferstand N, Cardash H, Baharav H. Effect of polymerization under pressure on indirect tensile mechanical properties of light-polymerized composites. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2002;88:381–387
  15. Awliya WY. The influence of temperature on the efficacy of polymerization of composite resin. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2007;8:9–16
  16. Ajdić D, McShan WM, McLaughlin RE, Savić G, Chang J, Carson MB, et al. Genome sequence of Streptococcus mutans UA159, a cariogenic dental pathogen. In: The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99. 2002;p. 14434–14439
  17. Montanaro L, Campoccia D, Rizzi S, Donati ME, Breschi L, Prati C, et al. Evaluation of bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on dental restorative materials. Biomaterials. 2004;25:4457–4463
  18. Kreth J, Hagerman E, Tam K, Merritt J, Wong DT, Wu BM, et al. Quantitative analyses of Streptococcus mutans biofilms with quartz microbalance, microjet impingement and confocal microscopy. Biofilms. 2004;1:277–284
  19. Baseren M. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures. Journal of Biomaterials Application. 2004;19:121–134
  20. Beun S, Glorieux T, Devaux J, Vreven J, Leloup G. Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites. Dental Materials. 2007;23:51–59
  21. Hotta M, Hirukawa H, Aono M. The effect of glaze on restorative glass-ionomer cements. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 1995;22:197–201
  22. Yap AUJ, Lye KW, Sau CW. Surface characteristics of tooth-colored restoratives polished utilizing different polishing systems. Operative Dentistry. 1997;22:260–265
  23. Yap AUJ, Yap SH, Téo CK, Ng JJ. Comparison of surface finish of new aesthetic restorative materials. Operative Dentistry. 2004;29:100–104
  24. Ellakuria J, Triana R, Minguez N, Soler I, Ibaseta G, Maza J, et al. Effect of one-year water storage on the surface microhardness of resin-modified versus conventional glass-ionomer cements. Dental Materials. 2003;19:286–290
  25. Tanner J, Vallittu PK, Söderling E. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to an E-glass fiber-reinforced composite and conventional restorative materials used in prosthetic dentistry. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 2000;49:250–256
  26. Satou J, Fukunaga A, Morikawa A, Matsumae I, Satou N, Shintani H. Streptococcal adherence to uncoated and saliva-coated restoratives. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 1991;18:421–429
  27. Okada K, Tosaki S, Hirota K, Hume WR. Surface hardness change of restorative filling materials stored in saliva. Dental Materials. 2001;17:34–39
  28. Kanchanavasita W, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ. Long-term surface micro-hardness of resin-modified glass ionomers. Journal of Dentistry. 1998;26:707–712
  29. Finner Y, Jaffer F, Santerre JP. Mutual influence of cholesterol esterase and pseudocholinesterase on the biodegradation of dental composites. Biomaterials. 2004;25:1787–1793
  30. Anusavice KJ. Degradability of dental ceramics. Advances in Dental Research. 1992;6:82–89
  31. Kawai K, Urano M. Effect of surface roughness of porcelain on adhesion of bacteria and their synthesizing glucans. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2000;83:664–667
  32. Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. Journal of Dental Research. 1990;69:1652–1658
  33. Chung SM, Yap AUJ. Effects of surface finish on indentation modulus and hardness of dental composite restoratives. Dental Materials. 2005;21:1008–1016
  34. Park S-H, Krejci I, Lutz F. Hardness of celluloid strip-finished or polished composite surfaces with time. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2000;83:660–663
  35. Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N, Aksoy G. The influence of one-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites. Operative Dentistry. 2008;33:44–50
  36. Oilo G. Biodegradation of dental composites/glass ionomer cements. Advances in Dental Research. 1992;6:50–54
  37. Borgström MK, Edwardssom S, Sullivan A, Svensäter G. Dental plaque mass and acid production activity of the microbiota on teeth. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2000;108:412–417
  38. Czarnecka B, Limanowska-Shaw H, Nicholson JW. Buffering and ion-release by a glass-ionomer cement under near-neutral and acidic conditions. Biomaterials. 2002;23:2783–2788
  39. Hayacibara MF, Rosa OPS, Koo H, Torres AS, Costa B, Cury JA. Effects of fluoride and aluminum from ionomeric materials on S. mutans biofilm. Journal of Dental Research. 2003;82:267–271
  40. Nomoto R, Uchida K, Momoi Y, Mc Cabe JF. Erosion of water-based cements evaluated by volumetric and gravimetric methods. Dental Materials. 2003;19:240–244
  41. Fano L, Fano V, Ma WY, Yang GW, Zhu F. Structure of dental glass-ionomer cements by confocal fluorescence microscopy and stereomicroscopy. Biomaterials. 2001;22:2353–2358
  42. Sales D, Sae-Lee D, Matsuy S, Ana ID. Short-term fluoride and cations release from polyacid-modified composites in a distilled water, and an acidic lactate buffer. Biomaterials. 2003;24:1687–1696
  43. Turssi CP, Hara AT, Magalhães CS, Serra MC, Rodrigues AL. Influence of storage regime prior to abrasion on surface topography of restorative materials. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2003;65B:227–232
  44. Kawai K, Takaoka T. Fluoride, hydrogen ions and HEMA release from light-cured GIC restoratives. American Journal of Dentistry. 2002;15:149–152
  45. Rogalewicz R, Batko K, Voelkel A. Identification of organic extractables from commercial resin-modified glass-ionomers using HPLC-MS. Journal of Environmental Monitoring. 2006;8:750–758

PII: S0300-5712(08)00187-5

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.06.002

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 10 , Pages 833-839 , October 2008