Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 10 , Pages 828-832 , October 2008

The effect of proximal contour on marginal ridge fracture of Class II composite resin restorations

Received 20 March 2008 ,Revised 3 June 2008 ,Accepted 4 June 2008.

References 

  1. Jernberg GR, Bakdash MB, Keenan KM. Relationship between proximal tooth open contacts and periodontal disease. Journal of Periodontology. 1983;54:529–533
  2. Koral SM, Howell TH, Jeffcoat MK. Alveolar bone lose due to open interproximal contacts in periodontal disease. Journal of Periodontology. 1981;52:447–450
  3. Hancock EB, Mayo CV, Schwab RR, Wirthlin MR. Influence of interdental contacts on periodontal status. Journal of Periodontology. 1980;51:445–449
  4. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Thompson VP, Holston AM, Gingell JC. A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin. Quintessence International. 1991;22:143–151
  5. In:  Hallmon WW,  Carranza FA,  Drisko CL,  Rapley JW,  Robinson P editor. Periodontal literature reviews Chicago American academy of periodontology. 1996;p. 87–88
  6. Loomans BAC, Opdam NJM, Roeters FJM, Bronkhorst EM, Burgersdijk RCW, Dörfer CE. A randomized clinical trial on proximal contacts of posterior composites. Journal of Dentistry. 2006;34:292–297
  7. Loomans BAC, Opdam NJM, Roeters FJM, Bronkhorst EM, Burgersdijk RCW. Comparison of proximal contacts of Class II composite resin restorations in vitro. Operative Dentistry. 2006;31:680–685
  8. Loomans BAC, Opdam NJM, Roeters FJM, Bronkhorst EM, Plasschaert AJM. Influence of composite resin consistency and placement techniques on proximal contact tightness of Class II restorations. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2006;8:305–310
  9. Burke FJ, Cheung SW, Mjör IA, Wilson NH. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom. Quintessence International. 1999;30:234–242
  10. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE. Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice. International Dental Journal. 2000;50:361–366
  11. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich and total-etch posterior composite resin restorations. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2007;9:469–475
  12. Brunthaler A, König F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clinical Oral Investigation. 2003;7:63–70
  13. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Operative Dentistry. 2004;29:481–508
  14. Shortall AC, Uctasli S, Marquis PM. Fracture resistance of anterior, posterior and universal light activated composite restoratives. Operative Dentistry. 2001;26:87–96
  15. Yap AU, Tan CH, Chung SM. Wear behavior of new composite restoratives. Operative Dentistry. 2004;29:269–274
  16. Kuijs RH, Fennis WM, Kreulen CM, Roeters FJ, Verdonschot N, Creugers NH. A comparison of fatigue resistance of three materials for cusp-replacing adhesive restorations. Journal of Dentistry. 2006;34:19–25

PII: S0300-5712(08)00186-3

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.06.001

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 10 , Pages 828-832 , October 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution