Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 10 , Pages 808-815 , October 2008

Influence of notch geometry and interface on stress concentration and distribution in micro-tensile bond strength specimens

  • Aline de A. Neves

      Affiliations

    • Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Leuven BIOMAT Research Cluster, Kapucijnenvoer 7, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
  • ,
  • Eduardo Coutinho

      Affiliations

    • Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Leuven BIOMAT Research Cluster, Kapucijnenvoer 7, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
  • ,
  • Marcio V. Cardoso

      Affiliations

    • Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Leuven BIOMAT Research Cluster, Kapucijnenvoer 7, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
  • ,
  • Siegfried Jaecques

      Affiliations

    • Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Leuven BIOMAT Research Cluster, Kapucijnenvoer 7, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
  • ,
  • Paul Lambrechts

      Affiliations

    • Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Leuven BIOMAT Research Cluster, Kapucijnenvoer 7, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
  • ,
  • Jos Vander Sloten

      Affiliations

    • Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design, Belgium
  • ,
  • Hans Van Oosterwyck

      Affiliations

    • Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design, Belgium
  • ,
  • Bart Van Meerbeek

      Affiliations

    • Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Leuven BIOMAT Research Cluster, Kapucijnenvoer 7, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +32 16 337587; fax: +32 16 332752.

Received 3 March 2008 ,Revised 29 May 2008 ,Accepted 31 May 2008.

References 

  1. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, et al. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength – evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dental Materials. 1994;10:236–240
  2. Griffith AA. Phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 1920;A224:163–198
  3. Sudsangiam S, van Noort R. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose?. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 1999;1:57–67
  4. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, et al. The microtensile bond test: a review. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 1999;1:299–309
  5. Dowling NE. Mechanical behaviour of materials: engineering methods for deformation, fracture, and fatigue. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 2007;p. 102–65
  6. Peterson RE. Stress concentration factors: charts and relations useful in making strength calculations for machine parts and structural elements. New York: John Wiley; 1974;p. 20–79
  7. Burrow MF, Thomas D, Swain MV, Tyas MJ. Analysis of tensile bond strengths using Weibull statistics. Biomaterials. 2004;25:5031–5035
  8. Zhang ZF, Eckert J. Unified tensile fracture criterion. Physical Review Letters 2005;94:94301.
  9. Patrick RL. Treatise on adhesion and adhesives. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1989;p. 55-21
  10. Clark JD, McGregor IJ. Ultimate tensile-stress over a zone – a new failure criterion for adhesive joints. Journal of Adhesion. 1993;42:227–245
  11. Anderson GP, Devries KL, Williams ML. Finite-element in adhesion analyses. International Journal of Fracture. 1973;9:421–436
  12. Kinloch AJ. Adhesion and adhesives: science and technology. London: Chapman & Hall; 1994;p. 188–263
  13. Chen B, Dillard DA, Dillard JG, Clark RL. Crack path selection in adhesively-bonded joints: the role of material properties. Journal of Adhesion. 2001;75:405–434
  14. Kinney JH, Balooch M, Marshall GM, Marshall SJ. A micromechanics model of the elastic properties of human dentine. Archives of Oral Biology. 1999;44:813–822
  15. Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, et al. Assessment by nano-identation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin–dentin bonding area. Journal of Dental Research. 1993;72:1434–1442
  16. Betamar N, Cardew G, Van Noort R. The effect of variations in hourglass specimen design on microtensile bond strength to dentin. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2007;9:427–436
  17. Betamar N, Cardew G, Van Noort R. Influence of specimen designs on the microtensile bond strength to dentin. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2007;9:159–168
  18. Meira JBC, Souza RM, Driemeier L, Ballester RY. Stress concentration in microtensile tests using uniform material. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2004;6:267–273
  19. Soares CJ, Soares PV, Santos PCF, Armstrong SR. Microtensile specimen attachment and shape – finite element analysis. Journal of Dental Research. 2008;87:89–93
  20. In:  Richards R editors. Principles of solid mechanics. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2001;p. 99–126
  21. Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Coutinho EC, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, et al. Influence of three specimens fixation modes on the micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives to dentin. Dental Materials Journal. 2007;26:694–699
  22. Lin CT, Lee SY, Kuo YW, Lu HK, Cheng HC. Laser-induced acoustic emission in aged dentin bonding systems. Journal of Dental Research. 1988;77:943

PII: S0300-5712(08)00171-1

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.05.018

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 10 , Pages 808-815 , October 2008