Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 9 , Pages 736-744, September 2008

Effect of mixing methods on the physical properties of dental stones

  • Shereen S. Azer

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Division of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, The Ohio State University College of Dentistry, 305 West 12th Avenue, #191, P.O. Box 182357, Columbus, OH 43218-2357, USA. Tel.: +1 614 292 7467; fax: +1 614 292 9422.
  • ,
  • Ronald E. Kerby
  • ,
  • Lisa A. Knobloch

Division of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, The Ohio State University College of Dentistry, Columbus, OH, USA

Received 13 February 2008; received in revised form 12 May 2008; accepted 13 May 2008.

Abstract 

Objectives

This in vitro comparative study evaluated the effect of different stone mixing methods on material properties of four dental stones. Two ADA type IV stones (Silky-Rock and Snap-Stone), one type V high expansion stone (Die Keen), and one recently introduced type V specialty stone (HandiMix) were chosen for this study.

Methods

Forty cylindrical specimens (25mm×12.5mm) were cast for each of the nine stone sub-groups and bench dried at 23±2°C for 1 and 24h. Specimens were then tested in an Instron in tensile and compression modes at crosshead speeds of 0.5 and 1.0mm/min, respectively. Four rectangular-shaped specimens (30mm×15mm×15mm) of each stone type were cast and bench dried for 48h. Knoop microhardness measurements were obtained from defined areas on each specimen for surface hardness testing using 200g load and 20s dwell time. A 12.6mm2 area was then delimited in the center of two sides of each specimen and photographed under low power magnification (40×). The average pore number per area was then determined for each specimen for surface porosity testing. The setting time and setting expansion for each stone type was recorded as well.

Results

ANOVA (P<0.001) and Ryan–Einot–Gabriel–Welsh test (P<0.05) showed significant differences between diametral tensile strengths and pore numbers for both stone types and mixing methods.

Conclusion

Within the limitations of this study, the newly introduced mixing method did not appear to have an effect on the physical properties of HandiMix stone.

Keywords: HandiMix, Dental stone, Gypsum, Compressive strength, Diametral tensile strength, Setting time, Setting expansion, Surface porosity, Microhardness, Hand-mixing, Vacuum-mixing, Shake-mixing

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented at the 85th General Session of the IADR, 21–24 March 2007, New Orleans, LA.

PII: S0300-5712(08)00160-7

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2008.05.010

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 9 , Pages 736-744, September 2008