Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 1 , Pages 31-38 , January 2009

Ten-year outcome of porcelain laminate veneers placed within the general dental services in England and Wales

  • F.J.T. Burke

      Affiliations

    • Primary Dental Care Research Group, University of Birmingham School of Dentistry, St. Chad's Queensway, Birmingham B4 6NN, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 121 237 2767; fax: +44 121 625 8815.
    • ,
  • P.S.K. Lucarotti

      Affiliations

    • NHS Business Services Authority (Dental Services Division), Eastbourne, Sussex BN20 8AD, UK

Received 5 June 2007 ,Revised 27 March 2008 ,Accepted 29 March 2008.

References 

  1. Digest of Statistics. Dental Practice Board, Eastbourne http://www.dpb.nhs.uk/archive/nhs_statistics/digest.shtml.
  2. Lucarotti PSK, Holder RL, Burke FJT. Analysis of an administrative database of half a million restorations over 11 years. Journal of Dentistry. 2005;33:791–803
  3. Robinson AD. The life of a filling. British Dental Journal. 1971;130:206–208
  4. Jokstad A, Bayne S, Blunck U, Tyas MJ, Wilson NHF. Quality of dental restorations. International Dental Journal. 2001;51:117–158
  5. Calamia JR. The etched porcelain veneer technique. New York State Dental Journal. 1988;54:48–50
  6. Magne P, Belser U. Bonded porcelain restorations in the anterior dentition. A biomimetic approach. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc.; 2002;
  7. Kreulen M, Creugers NHJ, Meijering AC. Meta-analysis of anterior veneer restorations in clinical studies. Journal of Dentistry. 1998;26:345–353
  8. Peumans M, Van Meerbeck B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. Journal of Dentistry. 2000;28:163–177
  9. Dumfahrt H, Schaffer H. Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service. Part II. Clinical results. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2000;13:9–18
  10. Peumans M, DeMunck J, Fleuws S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, VanMeerbeck B. A prospective ten-year clinical trial of porcelain veneers. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2004;6:65–76
  11. Dunne SM, Millar BJ. A longitudinal study of the clinical performance of porcelain veneers. British Dental Journal. 1993;175:317–322
  12. Collett D. Modelling survival data in medical research. Chapman and Hall; 1994;
  13. Elderton RJ. The prevalence of failure of restorations: a literature review. Journal of Dentistry. 1976;4:207–210
  14. Lucarotti PSK. The life expectancy of dental restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales. PhD thesis. University of Birmingham; 2004.
  15. Lucarotti PSK, Holder RL, Burke FJT. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales. Part 3. Variation by dentist factors. Journal of Dentistry. 2005;33:827–835
  16. Burke FJT, Lucarotti PSK, Holder RL. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales. Part 2. Variation by patients’ characteristics. Journal of Dentistry. 2005;33:817–826
  17. Adult dental health report. Her Majesty's Stationery Office: London; 1998.
  18. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. Journal of Dental Research. 1955;34:849–854
  19. Calamia JR, Simonsen RJ. Effect of coupling agents on bond strength of etched porcelain. Journal of Dental Research. 1984;63:179;[abstract 79]

PII: S0300-5712(08)00106-1

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.03.016

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 37, Issue 1 , Pages 31-38 , January 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution