Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 6 , Pages 444-449 , June 2008

The fracture behavior of premolar teeth with class II cavities restored by both direct composite restorations and endodontic post systems

  • F.P. Nothdurft

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Dental Materials Sciences, Dental School and Clinics, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Dental Materials Sciences, Saarland University, Homburg Campus, Building 71.2, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany. Tel.: +49 6841 1624901; fax: +49 6841 1624952.
    • ,
  • E. Seidel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthodontics, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
    • ,
  • F. Gebhart

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthodontics, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
    • ,
  • M. Naumann

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthodontics and Material Sciences, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
    • ,
  • P.J. Motter

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Dental Materials Sciences, Dental School and Clinics, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
    • ,
  • P.R. Pospiech

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Dental Materials Sciences, Dental School and Clinics, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany

Received 16 January 2008 ,Revised 29 February 2008 ,Accepted 4 March 2008.

References 

  1. Peroz I, Blankenstein F, Lange KP, Naumann M. Restoring endodontically treated teeth with posts and cores—a review. Quintessence International. 2005;36:737–746
  2. Kwiatkowski S, Geller W. A preliminary consideration of the glass-ceramic dowel post and core. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 1989;2:51–55
  3. Duret B, Duret F, Reynaud M. Long-life physical property preservation and postendodontic rehabilitation with the Composipost. Compendendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry Supplement. 1996;20:S50–S56
  4. Meyenberg H, Lüthy H, Schärer P. Zirconia posts: a new all-ceramic concept for nonvital abutment teeth. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry. 1994;6:274–281
  5. Paul SJ, Werder P. Clinical success of zirconium oxide posts with resin composite or glass-ceramic cores in endodontically treated teeth: a 4-year retrospective study. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2004;17:524–528
  6. Nothdurft FP, Pospiech PR. Clinical evaluation of pulpless teeth restored with conventionally cemented zirconia posts: a pilot study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2006;95:311–314
  7. Lanza A, Aversa R, Rengo S, Apicella D, Apicella A. 3D FEA of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary incisor. Dental Materials. 2005;21:709–715
  8. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S. Efficacy of different adhesive techniques on bonding to root canal walls: an SEM investigation. Dental Materials. 2001;17:422–429
  9. Vichi A, Grandini S, Ferrari M. Clinical procedure for luting glass-fiber posts. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2001;3:353–359
  10. Naumann M, Preuss A, Frankenberger R. Reinforcement effect of adhesively luted fiber reinforced composite versus titanium posts. Dental Materials. 2007;23:138–144
  11. Naumann M, Preuss A, Frankenberger R. Load capability of excessively flared teeth restored with fiber-reinforced composite posts and all-ceramic crowns. Operative Dentistry. 2006;31:699–704
  12. Naumann M, Rosentritt M, Preuss A, Dietrich T. The effect of alveolar bone loss on the load capability of restored endodontically treated teeth: a comparative in vitro study. Journal of Dentistry. 2006;34:790–795
  13. Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2002;87:431–437
  14. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Le Bell-Ronnlof AM, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH. In vitro fracture behavior of maxillary premolars with metal crowns and several post-and-core systems. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2006;114:250–256
  15. Heydecke G, Butz F, Hussein A, Strub JR. Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2002;87:438–445
  16. Butz F, Lennon AM, Heydecke G, Strub JR. Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2001;14:58–64
  17. Heydecke G, Butz F, Strub JR. Fracture strength and survival rate of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with approximal cavities after restoration with different post and core systems: an in-vitro study. Journal of Dentistry. 2001;29:427–433
  18. Tamse A, Fuss Z, Lustig J, Kaplavi J. An evaluation of endodontically treated vertically fractured teeth. Journal of Endodontics. 1999;25:506–508
  19. Tamse A, Zilburg I, Halpern J. Vertical root fractures in adjacent maxillary premolars: an endodontic–prosthetic perplexity. International Endodontic Journal. 1998;31:127–132
  20. Hannig C, Westphal C, Becker K, Attin T. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2005;94:342–349
  21. Hurmuzlu F, Kiremitci A, Serper A, Altundasar E, Siso SH. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with ormocer and packable composite. Journal of Endodontics. 2003;29:838–840
  22. Hurmuzlu F, Serper A, Siso SH, Er K. In vitro fracture resistance of root-filled teeth using new-generation dentine bonding adhesives. International Endodontic Journal. 2003;36:770–773
  23. Sagsen B, Aslan B. Effect of bonded restorations on the fracture resistance of root filled teeth. International Endodontic Journal. 2006;39:900–904
  24. Sorrentino R, Salameh Z, Zarone F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Effect of post-retained composite restoration of MOD preparations on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2007;9:49–56
  25. Siso SH, Hurmuzlu F, Turgut M, Altundasar E, Serper A, Er K. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques. International Endodontic Journal. 2007;40:161–168
  26. Yamada Y, Tsubota Y, Fukushima S. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2004;17:94–98
  27. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH. A structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber, metal, and ceramic post-and-core systems. International Journal Prosthodontics. 2004;17:476–482
  28. Torbjorner A, Fransson B. A literature review on the prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2004;17:369–376
  29. DeLong R, Douglas WH. Development of an artificial oral environment for the testing of dental restoratives: bi-axial force and movement control. Journal of Dental Research. 1983;62:32–36
  30. Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M. An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator. Schweizer Monatsschrift für Zahnmedizin. 1990;100:953–960
  31. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, Dellavia C, Tartaglia GM. Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2004;31:18–22
  32. Nishigawa K, Bando E, Nakano M. Quantitative study of bite force during sleep associated bruxism. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2001;28:485–491
  33. Grandini S, Goracci C, Tay FR, Grandini R, Ferrari M. Clinical evaluation of the use of fiber posts and direct resin restorations for endodontically treated teeth. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2005;18:399–404
  34. Nothdurft FP, Seidel E, Gebhart F, Naumann M, Motter PJ, Pospiech PR. Influence of different endodontic posts on the fracture behavior of crowned premolars with class II cavities. Journal of Dentistry. 2008;36:287–293
  35. Mannocci F, Qualtrough AJ, Worthington HV, Watson TF, Pitt Ford TR. Randomized clinical comparison of endodontically treated teeth restored with amalgam or with fiber posts and resin composite: five-year results. Operative Dentistry. 2005;30:9–15
  36. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. American Journal of Dentistry. 2000;13:15B–18B

PII: S0300-5712(08)00076-6

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.03.004

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 6 , Pages 444-449 , June 2008

Article Tools