Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 5 , Pages 301-308, May 2008

Sex differences in denture satisfaction

  • Shaoxia Pan

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    • Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China
  • ,
  • Manal Awad

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    • College of Dentistry, Department of General and Specialist Dental Practice, University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
  • ,
  • J. Mark Thomason

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    • School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, UK
  • ,
  • Eric Dufresne

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
  • ,
  • Taira Kobayashi

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    • Department of Crown and Bridge Prothodontics, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Mastudo, Chiba, Japan
  • ,
  • Suguru Kimoto

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    • Department of Gnatho-Oral Prosthetics Rehabilitation, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Mastudo, Chiba, Japan
  • ,
  • Stephanie D. Wollin

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
  • ,
  • Jocelyne S. Feine

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Canada
    • Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, 3550 University Street, Suite 101, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2A7, Canada. Tel.: +1 514 398 7203x00052; fax: +1 514 398 7220.

Received 23 November 2007; received in revised form 6 February 2008; accepted 8 February 2008.

Abstract 

Objectives

Males and females differ in their responses to many health conditions and treatments. The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to determine whether there are differences in the way that male and female edentulous elders rate their satisfaction with new mandibular implant overdentures (IODs) and conventional dentures (CDs), at 6 and 12 months following delivery.

Methods

Edentulous elders (n=256) were randomly assigned to receive maxillary conventional dentures and either mandibular overdentures supported by two implants with ball attachments or conventional dentures. Participants rated their general satisfaction, as well as other features of their dentures (comfort, stability, ability to chew, aesthetics, etc.) prior to treatment and 6 and 12 months after delivery.

Results

Ratings of satisfaction with IODs were significantly higher than with CDs. Six months after delivery, females in the CD group rated their general satisfaction and satisfaction with ability to chew and aesthetics significantly lower than did the males. The sex differences in the CD group remained at 12 months after delivery. However, males and females in the IOD group rated their general satisfaction and all six subcategories equally.

Conclusions

Elderly females are less satisfied with conventional dentures than elderly males with regards to aesthetics and ability to chew, but equally satisfied with implant overdentures. At 6 and 12 months after delivery, elderly edentulous males and females wearing mandibular implant overdentures were significantly more satisfied than those wearing conventional dentures.

Keywords: Implant, Overdenture, Sex difference, Satisfaction, Conventional denture, Elders

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(08)00051-1

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2008.02.009

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 5 , Pages 301-308, May 2008