Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 5 , Pages 322-325 , May 2008

Marginal leakage in direct and indirect composite resin restorations in primary teeth: An in vitro study

  • M.C. Ferreira

      Affiliations

    • Dra. Meire Coelho Ferreira, Rua Doze, 648, Ilha dos Araújos, 35020-690 Governador Valadares-MG, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +55 33 3275 2988; fax: +55 48 3234 8776.
    • ,
  • R.S. Vieira

      Affiliations

    • Dr. Ricardo de Sousa Vieira, Rua Prof. Eduardo Luz, 319, Córrego Grande, 88037-210 Florianópolis-SC, Brazil

Received 21 November 2007 ,Revised 29 January 2008 ,Accepted 30 January 2008.

References 

  1. Hübel S, Mejàre I. Conventional versus resin-modified glass ionomer cement for class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2003;13:2–8
  2. Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT. Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7-year study of three resin-modified glass ionomer and a compomer. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2004;112:188–196
  3. Cannon ML. Advances in pediatric esthetic dentistry. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry. 2003;24:34–39
  4. Lutz F, Krejci I, Oldenburg TR. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite restorations: a new restorative technique. Quintessence International. 1986;17:777–784
  5. Rastelli FP, Vieira RS, Rastelli MC. Avaliação clínica, após 12 meses, da infiltração de restaurações de resina composta em molares decíduos. Jornal Brasileiro de Odontopediatria e Odontolologia do Bebê. 1998;8:290–295
  6. Iida K, Inokoshi S, Kurosaki N. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cimentation vs. direct composites. Operative Dentistry. 2003;28:445–452
  7. Mota CS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different cements. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2003;5:63–70
  8. Rabelo RT, Caldo-Teixeira AS, Puppin-Rontani RM. An alternative aesthetic restoration for extensive coronal destruction in primary molars: indirect restorative technique with composite resin. The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2005;29:277–281
  9. Müller AS, Scur AL, Reston EG. Estudo comparativo in vitro do grau de infiltração marginal em restaurações indiretas. Revista ABO Nacional. 1999;7:238–244
  10. Nilsson A, Alaeddim S, Karlsson S, Milleding P, Wennerberg A. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of bonded composite inlays. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2000;13:52–58
  11. Gwinnett AJ. The ultra structure of the “ prism less” enamel of human teeth. Archives of Oral Biology. 1967;12:381
  12. Almeida MJP, Mandarino F. Avaliação in vitro da microinfiltração marginal em restaurações indiretas com resina composta, em função da localização das margens e dos agentes cimentantes. Revista de Odontologia da UNESP. 1999;28:317–328
  13. Garófalo JC. Novos compostos para restaurações de dentes anteriores e posteriors. Apresentando novos produtos: 3M Filtek Z250 e Filtek P60. Revista Dental Gaúcho. 1999;6:36–40
  14. Motokawa W, Braham RL, Teshima B. Clinical evaluation of light-cured composite resin inlays in primary molars. American Journal of Dentistry. 1990;3:115–118
  15. Wendt SL, Leinfelder KF. The clinical evaluation of heat-treated composite resin inlays. Journal of the American Dental Association. 1990;120:177–181
  16. Llena Puy MC, Navarro LF, Faus Llacer VF, Ferrandez A. Composite resin inlays: a study of marginal adaptation. Quintessence International. 1993;24:429–433
  17. Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Katoh Y. How heat treatment and thermal cycling affect wear of composite resin inlay. Journal of the American Dental Association. 1994;125:1467–1472
  18. Coradazzi IL, Pascotto RC, Franco EB, Mondelli J. Avaliação da infiltração marginal em incrustações de resina composta e de porcelana. Revista Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo. 1993;7:81–88
  19. Ciucchi B, Buillagnet S, Holz J. Proximal adaptation and marginal seal of posterior composite resin restorations placed with direct and indirect techniques. Quintessence International. 1990;21:663–668
  20. Kenyon BJ, Frederickson D, Hagge MS. Gingival seal of deep class II direct and indirect composite restorations. American Journal of Dentistry. 2007;20:3–6
  21. Fruits TJ, Knapp JA, Khajotia SS. Microleakage in the proximal walls of direct and indirect posterior resin slot restorations. Operative Dentistry. 2006;31:719–727
  22. Duquia RCS, Osinaga PWR, Demarco FF, Habekost LV, Conceição EN. Cervical microleakage in MOD restorations: in vitro comparison of indirect and direct composite. Operative Dentistry. 2006;31:682–687

PII: S0300-5712(08)00040-7

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.01.016

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 5 , Pages 322-325 , May 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution