Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 5 , Pages 360-368, May 2008

The protective nature of pellicle towards toothpaste abrasion on enamel and dentine

  • Andrew Joiner

      Affiliations

    • Unilever Oral Care, Quarry Road East, Bebington, Wirral CH63 3JW, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 151 641 3786; fax: +44 151 641 1800.
  • ,
  • Annika Schwarz

      Affiliations

    • Clinic of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, University Hospital, Saarland University, Building 73, D-66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany
  • ,
  • Carole J. Philpotts

      Affiliations

    • Unilever Oral Care, Quarry Road East, Bebington, Wirral CH63 3JW, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Trevor F. Cox

      Affiliations

    • Unilever Oral Care, Quarry Road East, Bebington, Wirral CH63 3JW, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Karin Huber

      Affiliations

    • Clinic of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, University Hospital, Saarland University, Building 73, D-66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany
  • ,
  • Matthias Hannig

      Affiliations

    • Clinic of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, University Hospital, Saarland University, Building 73, D-66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany

Received 17 October 2007; received in revised form 14 January 2008; accepted 15 January 2008.

Abstract 

Objectives

To determine the protective nature of pellicle towards toothpaste abrasion.

Methods

The enamel region of human enamel–dentine blocks was indented with a Knoop diamond and the profile across the enamel–dentine junction was measured. Blocks were either exposed to deionised water or placed onto intra-oral appliances and worn in the mouth to produce in situ pellicles. This was followed by a 10-day period of tooth brushing experiments. Each day, specimens were brushed with a slurry of either Toothpaste A (RDA=90) or Toothpaste B (RDA=204) for 25 cycles (10s) on a brushing machine. This was repeated three times per day for a total of 750 brushing cycles. Between brushing cycles specimens were returned to water or in situ. The geometry of the Knoop indents and the enamel–dentine profile were re-measured and the enamel and dentine wear calculated. Specimens were also prepared for TEM analyses.

Results

The mean enamel wear (μm) for Toothpastes A and B (water) was 0.23 and 0.06, and for Toothpastes A and B (in situ) was 0.03 and 0.08, respectively. The mean dentine wear (μm) for Toothpastes A and B (water) was 5.08 and 6.03, and for Toothpastes A and B (in situ) was 1.94 and 1.70, respectively. For Toothpaste A, the presence of in situ pellicle significantly (p<0.05) reduced enamel and dentine wear compared to water and for Toothpaste B, dentine wear was significantly reduced compared to water. After tooth brushing, residues of the in situ pellicle layer could be detected on enamel and dentine surfaces by TEM analysis.

Conclusions

The study has demonstrated for the first time that the presence of pellicle can significantly reduce toothpaste abrasion.

Keywords: Pellicle, Tooth wear, Abrasion, Enamel, Dentine

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(08)00026-2

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2008.01.010

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 5 , Pages 360-368, May 2008