Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 4 , Pages 287-293 , April 2008

Influence of endodontic posts on the fracture behavior of crowned premolars with class II cavities

  • F.P. Nothdurft

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Dental Materials Sciences, Dental School and Clinics, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Dental Materials Sciences, Saarland University, Homburg Campus, Bldg. 71.2, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany. Tel.: +49 6841 1624901; fax: +49 6841 1624952.
    • ,
  • E. Seidel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthodontics, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
    • ,
  • F. Gebhart

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthodontics, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
    • ,
  • M. Naumann

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Dental Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Cranio-Mandibular Disorders, Charite, University Medical School, Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany
    • ,
  • P.J. Motter

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Dental Materials Sciences, Dental School and Clinics, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
    • ,
  • P.R. Pospiech

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Dental Materials Sciences, Dental School and Clinics, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany

Received 2 November 2007 ,Revised 10 January 2008 ,Accepted 12 January 2008.

References 

  1. Peroz I, Blankenstein F, Lange KP, Naumann M. Restoring endodontically treated teeth with posts and cores—a review. Quintessence International. 2005;36:737–746
  2. Kwiatkowski S, Geller W. A preliminary consideration of the glass–ceramic dowel post and core. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 1989;2:51–55
  3. Duret B, Duret F, Reynaud M. Long-life physical property preservation and postendodontic rehabilitation with the Composipost. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry Supplement. 1996;S50–S56
  4. Meyenberg H, Lüthy H, Schärer P. Zirconia posts: a new all-ceramic concept for nonvital abutment teeth. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry. 1994;274–281
  5. Paul SJ, Werder P. Clinical success of zirconium oxide posts with resin composite or glass–ceramic cores in endodontically treated teeth: a 4-year retrospective study. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2004;17:524–528
  6. Nothdurft FP, Pospiech PR. Clinical evaluation of pulpless teeth restored with conventionally cemented zirconia posts: a pilot study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2006;95:311–314
  7. Lanza A, Aversa R, Rengo S, Apicella D, Apicella A. 3D FEA of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary incisor. Dental Materials. 2005;21:709–715
  8. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S. Efficacy of different adhesive techniques on bonding to root canal walls: an SEM investigation. Dental Materials. 2001;17:422–429
  9. Naumann M, Preuss A, Frankenberger R. Load capability of excessively flared teeth restored with fiber-reinforced composite posts and all-ceramic crowns. Operative Dentistry. 2006;31:699–704
  10. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Le Bell-Ronnlof AM, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH. In vitro fracture behavior of maxillary premolars with metal crowns and several post-and-core systems. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2006;114:250–256
  11. Butz F, Lennon AM, Heydecke G, Strub JR. Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2001;14:58–64
  12. Heydecke G, Butz F, Strub JR. Fracture strength and survival rate of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with approximal cavities after restoration with different post and core systems: an in-vitro study. Journal of Dentistry. 2001;29:427–433
  13. Tamse A, Fuss Z, Lustig J, Kaplavi J. An evaluation of endodontically treated vertically fractured teeth. Journal of Endodontics. 1999;25:506–508
  14. Tamse A, Zilburg I, Halpern J. Vertical root fractures in adjacent maxillary premolars: an endodontic–prosthetic perplexity. International Endodontic Journal. 1998;31:127–132
  15. Hannig C, Westphal C, Becker K, Attin T. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2005;94:342–349
  16. Hurmuzlu F, Kiremitci A, Serper A, Altundasar E, Siso SH. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with ormocer and packable composite. Journal of Endodontics. 2003;29:838–840
  17. Siso SH, Hurmuzlu F, Turgut M, Altundasar E, Serper A, Er K. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques. International Endodontic Journal. 2007;40:161–168
  18. Yamada Y, Tsubota Y, Fukushima S. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2004;17:94–98
  19. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH. A structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber, metal, and ceramic post-and-core systems. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2004;17:476–482
  20. Mannocci F, Qualtrough AJ, Worthington HV, Watson TF, Pitt Ford TR. Randomized clinical comparison of endodontically treated teeth restored with amalgam or with fiber posts and resin composite: five-year results. Operative Dentistry. 2005;30:9–15
  21. Torbjorner A, Fransson B. A literature review on the prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2004;17:369–376
  22. Heydecke G, Butz F, Hussein A, Strub JR. Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2002;87:438–445
  23. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, Dellavia C, Tartaglia GM. Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2004;31:18–22
  24. Nishigawa K, Bando E, Nakano M. Quantitative study of bite force during sleep associated bruxism. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2001;28:485–491
  25. Sorrentino R, Salameh Z, Zarone F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Effect of post-retained composite restoration of MOD preparations on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2007;9:49–56
  26. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. American Journal of Dentistry. 2000;13:15B–18B
  27. Grandini S, Goracci C, Tay FR, Grandini R, Ferrari M. Clinical evaluation of the use of fiber posts and direct resin restorations for endodontically treated teeth. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2005;18:399–404
  28. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Grandini S, De Sanctis M, Goracci C. Post placement affects survival of endodontically treated premolars. Journal of Dental Research. 2007;86:729–734
  29. Kositbowornchai S, Nuansakul R, Sikram S, Sinahawattana S, Saengmontri S. Root fracture detection: a comparison of direct digital radiography with conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2001;30:106–109
  30. Youssefzadeh S, Gahleitner A, Dorffner R, Bernhart T, Kainberger FM. Dental vertical root fractures: value of CT in detection. Radiology. 1999;210:545–549

PII: S0300-5712(08)00023-7

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.01.007

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 4 , Pages 287-293 , April 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution