Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 4 , Pages 281-286, April 2008

Bond strength of glass–ceramics on the fluorosed enamel surfaces

  • Muhittin Toman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ege University, 35100 Bornova, İzmir, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +90 232 388 03 27; fax: +90 232 388 03 25.
  • ,
  • Ebru Cal

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ege University, 35100 Bornova, İzmir, Turkey
  • ,
  • Murat Türkün

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
  • ,
  • Fahinur Ertuğrul

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey

Received 17 October 2007; received in revised form 11 January 2008; accepted 11 January 2008.

Abstract 

Objectives

Effect of different adhesive luting systems on the shear bond strength of IPS Empress 2 ceramic restorations to fluorosed enamel surface was investigated.

Methods

Forty-eight ceramic discs (2mm×3mm; IPS Empress 2) were fabricated. Twenty-four non-carious extracted human molar teeth with fluorosis and 24 without fluorosis were cleaned with pumice using a plastic brush and then they were divided into two main groups. The IPS Empress 2 ceramic discs were luted to the teeth of four subgroups with two different adhesive luting systems, Variolink 2/Excite DSC (etch-and-rinse) and Clearfil Esthetic Cement/ED Primer II (self-etch), thermocycling was performed 5000 times. Shear bond strengths were tested using Shimadzu Universal Testing Machine until failure. An optical microscope and image analyzer were used at 10× and 1000× magnification to analyze the surfaces for adhesive, cohesive and mixed failure percentages. Data was analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey test at a significance level of p<0.05.

Results

Mean shear bond strength data of the groups in MPa were; Variolink 2/Excite DSC on fluorosed enamel: 18.3±3.08, Variolink 2/Excite DSC on non-fluorosed enamel: 18.79±2.65, Clearfil Esthetic Cement/ED Primer II on fluorosed enamel: 8.43±2.45, Clearfil Esthetic Cement/ED Primer II on non-fluorosed enamel: 13.53±1.68. Mixed failure was the most prevalent type of failure in moderate fluorosed and non-fluorosed teeth with etch-and-rinse dentin bonding system, and in fluorosed teeth with self-etch dentin bonding system.

Conclusions

The use of an etch-and-rinse adhesive luting procedure produced higher bond strengths of glass–ceramics bonded to fluorosed and non-fluorosed enamel surfaces than the self-etch bonding system.

Keywords: Shear bond strength, Glass–ceramics, Fluorosis, Adhesive luting

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(08)00022-5

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2008.01.006

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 4 , Pages 281-286, April 2008