Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 3 , Pages 214-218, March 2008

An in vitro investigation of the effect and retention of bioactive glass air-abrasive on sound and carious dentine

  • G. Paolinelis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomaterials, King's College London Dental Institute at Guy's, King's College & St. Thomas’ Hospitals, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • A. Banerjee

      Affiliations

    • Department of Conservative Dentistry, Floor 26, King's College London Dental Institute at Guy's, King's College & St. Thomas’ Hospitals, London Bridge, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 207 188 1577; fax: +44 207188 7486.
  • ,
  • T.F. Watson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomaterials, King's College London Dental Institute at Guy's, King's College & St. Thomas’ Hospitals, United Kingdom
    • Department of Conservative Dentistry, Floor 26, King's College London Dental Institute at Guy's, King's College & St. Thomas’ Hospitals, London Bridge, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom

Received 12 October 2007; received in revised form 27 November 2007; accepted 6 December 2007.

Abstract 

Objectives

To examine the removal rate of sound and carious dentine using bioactive glass air-abrasion and investigate abrasive particle retention of alumina and bioactive glass on abraded dentine.

Methods

Crushed bioactive glass was investigated as an alternative air-abrasive to alumina at air pressures of 138, 413 and 689kPa in the presence or absence of water. The correlation coefficient between the amount of dentine removed using bioactive glass air-abrasion and the Knoop Hardness Number of dentine was calculated. The comparative retention of bioactive glass (BG) and alumina (AL) abrasive on human dentine blocks were calculated as atomic ratios acquired by spectral analysis between air-abrasive tracers (Si for bioactive glass, and Al for alumina) and Ca. A total of 60 dentine blocks were abraded using Al or BG in 12 groups of 5 using three different pressures in using wet and dry air-abrasion.

Results

The amount of dentine removed using bioactive glass air-abrasion had a Somers’ D coefficient of 0.65 for the Knoop hardness. Wet air-abrasion caused a significant (p 0.05) decrease in the amount of abrasive retained on the surface for Al air-abrasion at 138 and 413kPa and BG air-abrasion at 413 and 689kPa.

Conclusion

There was a negative correlation between propellant pressure and abrasive retained. Bioglass removed healthy dentine at a higher rate than carious dentine – the difference however, being less than with equivalent alumina air-abrasion, thus making it a potentially more selective instrument for clinical caries excavation.

Keywords: Air-abrasion, Bioactive glass, Dental caries, Dentine, Micro-hardness, Spectral analysis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(07)00252-7

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2007.12.004

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 3 , Pages 214-218, March 2008