Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 3 , Pages 194-203, March 2008

Multi-factorial analysis of a cusp-replacing adhesive premolar restoration: A finite element study

  • Chun-Li Lin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chang Gung University, 259 Wen-Hua 1st Road, Kwei-Shan, Tao-Yuan 333, Taiwan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +886 3 2118800x5759; fax: +886 3 2118050.
  • ,
  • Yen-Hsiang Chang

      Affiliations

    • Operative Dentistry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 123, Ding-Hu Road, Kuei-Shan, Tao-Yuan 333, Taiwan
    • Tel.: +886 3 3196200x2127; fax: +886 3 3196200x2138.
  • ,
  • Perng-Ru Liu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Comprehensive Dentistry, University of Alabama, School of Dentistry, 1919 7th Ave. South, Box 82, Birmingham, AL 35294, United States
    • Tel.: +886 1 205 9341067; fax: +886 1 205 9752883.

Received 25 April 2007; received in revised form 21 November 2007; accepted 30 November 2007.

Abstract 

Objectives

This study investigates the biomechanical interactions among restorative materials, cuspal preparation designs, and cement thickness in a cusp-replacing adhesive premolar restoration.

Methods

Twenty-seven, 3D finite element (FE) models designed in a typical MODL restoration with three restorative materials (CAD/CAM ceramic block, indirect resin composite and glass-ceramic), three cavity preparation designs (buccal cuspal reduction of 1.0mm, 1.5mm and 2.0mm in cuspal height) and three cement thicknesses (50μm, 100μm and 150μm) were constructed to perform the simulations. The ANOVA test was performed to determine the relative importance of the investigated factors and main effects for each of the three investigated factor levels (restorative material, preparation design and cement thickness) in terms of the principal stress values.

Results

The results indicated that the stress value in the restorative material was influenced primarily by the restorative material itself (95.49%). Preparation design was found as the major factor (>80%) affecting the stress values in the remaining tooth and luting cement.

Conclusions

Using a low modulus restorative material presented more favorable biomechanical performance and the cuspal height might be at least 1.5mm to critically reduce the stress values when cuspal-coverage treatment is considered. The investigated cement thickness only slightly affected the mechanical behavior of the cuspal replacement restoration.

Keywords: Cuspal-coverage, Cement thickness, Restorative material, Preparation design, Finite element analysis, Biomechanics

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(07)00248-5

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2007.11.016

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 36, Issue 3 , Pages 194-203, March 2008