Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 12 , Pages 915-922, December 2007

Bonding of acid-etch and self-etch adhesives to human fluorosed dentine

  • P.G.K. Waidyasekera

      Affiliations

    • Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Sciences, Graduate school, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +81 3 5803 5483; fax: +81 3 5803 0195.
  • ,
  • T. Nikaido

      Affiliations

    • Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Sciences, Graduate school, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan
  • ,
  • D.D.S. Weerasinghe

      Affiliations

    • Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Sciences, Graduate school, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan
  • ,
  • J. Tagami

      Affiliations

    • Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Sciences, Graduate school, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan
    • Center of Excellence Program for Frontier Research on Molecular Destruction and Reconstruction of Tooth and Bone, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan

Received 6 July 2007; received in revised form 28 August 2007; accepted 3 September 2007.

Abstract 

Objective

The objective of our laboratory study was to determine the bonding efficacy of two-step self-etching primer system (Clearfil SE Bond), all-in-one adhesive (Clearfil Tri S Bond) and acid-etching system (Single Bond) to human fluorosed dentine.

Methods

Forty-eight human molars were grouped according to modified Thylstrup-Fejerskov index (TFI) into normal (N, TFI 0), mild fluorosis (ML, TFI 1–3) and moderate fluorosis (MD, TFI 4–6). Superficial dentine was exposed and ground with 600-grit silicon carbide paper. Teeth of each group were randomly divided into three sub-groups. Each sub-group was treated with one of the three bonding systems. A resin composite was built up on the bonded surfaces and stored in water at 37°C for 24h. They were serially sectioned in buccal-lingual direction into 0.7–1.0mm thick slabs. Slices were trimmed for microtensile bond test and stressed in tension at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. The data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA (p=0.05). The adhesive/dentine interfaces of the bonded specimens were examined by a FE-SEM.

Results

Significantly higher microtensile bond strength (μTBS) was found with Clearfil SE Bond to mild fluorosed dentine than did Single Bond and Clearfil Tri S Bond. Lower μTBS were found for Single Bond (not significant) and Clearfil Tri S Bond than Clearfil SE Bond with moderately fluorosed dentine. Thickness of the hybrid layer produced by Clearfil SE Bond in mild and moderately fluorosed groups was less than with normal dentine.

Conclusion

Two-step self-etching system, Clearfil SE Bond, showed a higher bonding performance to fluorosed dentine than Single Bond and Tri S Bond.

Keywords: Dental fluorosis, Dentine bonding

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(07)00168-6

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2007.09.002

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 12 , Pages 915-922, December 2007