Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 11 , Pages 862-870, November 2007

Effects of conditioners on microshear bond strength to enamel after carbamide peroxide bleaching and/or casein phosphopeptide–amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP–ACP) treatment

School of Dental Science, University of Melbourne, 720 Swanston Street, Victoria 3010, Australia

Received 29 May 2007; received in revised form 16 August 2007; accepted 22 August 2007.

Abstract 

Objectives

To evaluate (a) the enamel microshear bond strength (MSBS) of a universal adhesive and (b) the effects of conditioning with a self-etching primer adhesive with/without prior bleaching and/or casein phosphopeptide–amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP–ACP) application.

Methods

Thirty-five molars were cut into four sections, assigned randomly to four groups (no treatment; 16% carbamide peroxide bleaching; CPP–ACP-containing paste (Tooth Mousse, TM); bleaching and TM) and treated accordingly. Specimens were divided into two for bonding with either a self-etching primer (Clearfil SE Bond, CSE) or a total-etch adhesive (Single Bond, SB). Specimens for CSE bonding were subdivided for one of four preconditioning treatments (no conditioning; 30–40% phosphoric acid (PA); 15% EDTA; 20% polyacrylic acid conditioner (Cavity conditioner, CC) and treated. The adhesives were applied and resin composite bonded to the enamel using microtubes (internal diameter 0.75mm). Bonds were stressed in shear until failure, mean MSBS calculated and data analysed using ANOVA with Tukey's HSD test (α=0.05). The modes of bond failure were assessed and classified.

Results

Two-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between treatments (P<0.0001), conditioners (P<0.0001) and a significant interaction between treatments and conditioners (P=0.001). One-way ANOVA revealed no significant differences in MSBS following any of the treatments for SB; following TM application for CSE without preconditioning; and significant differences in MSBS following bleaching with and without TM application for CSE. With preconditioning, applying PA before CSE post-bleaching and either PA or CC before CSE post-TM application, resulted in significant differences in MSBS (P<0.05).

Conclusions

The use of conditioners prior to bonding with the self-etching primer adhesive system on treated enamel may significantly improve bond strengths.

Keywords: Bleaching, Casein phosphopeptide–amorphous calcium phosphate, Self-etching priming adhesives, Conditioners, Enamel, Microshear bond strength

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(07)00165-0

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2007.08.007

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 11 , Pages 862-870, November 2007