Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 11 , Pages 827-835, November 2007

Laboratory assessment of the retentive potential of adhesive posts: A review

  • Cecilia Goracci

      Affiliations

    • Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, Viale Bracci, Siena 53100, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +39 0586 892283; fax: +39 0586 898305.
  • ,
  • Simone Grandini

      Affiliations

    • Department of Endodontics, University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, Viale Bracci, Siena 53100, Italy
  • ,
  • Maurizio Bossù

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pedodontics, University ‘La Sapienza’, 287/A Viale Regina Elena, Roma 00161, Italy
  • ,
  • Egidio Bertelli

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, Viale Bracci, Siena 53100, Italy
  • ,
  • Marco Ferrari

      Affiliations

    • Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, Viale Bracci, Siena 53100, Italy

Received 19 May 2007; received in revised form 22 July 2007; accepted 25 July 2007.

Abstract 

Objectives

This review aimed at summarizing the laboratory evidence collected on the retentive ability of adhesive posts since their introduction in dentistry.

Data

Data were searched in articles published or in press in peer-review journals listed in MEDLINE.

Sources

Papers were retrieved through PubMed.

Study selection

To collect the evidence of interest, the following search terms were used: bond* AND fiber post AND in vitro; lut* AND fiber post AND in vitro; push-out AND fiber post; pull-out AND fiber post; microtensile AND fiber post. “Related Links” were also considered and articles cited in the initially retrieved papers were included if relevant. No time limit was given to the query.

Conclusions

Seventy relevant papers were reviewed. The retentive ability of adhesive posts has been tested with the microtensile technique, post-pull-out and push-out tests. If small-sized specimens are obtained, such as in microtensile and thin-slice push-out, stress uniformity is favoured, local differences in bonding conditions can be discerned, and the number of teeth needed for the test can be reduced. Although adhesion to intraradicular dentin is more challenging to achieve than bonding to crown tissues, the post-retention achieved with current luting systems and techniques is adequate to ensure the clinical success of adhesive post-retained restorations. To enhance the bond at the post-core and post-cement interfaces, several chemical pre-treatments of the post-surface have been tested with positive results. Self-adhesive resin cements, recently proposed to simplify the post-luting procedure, should be investigated further with regard to durability.

Keywords: Adhesion, Retention, Post, Microtensile, Push-out, Pull-out, Laboratory

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(07)00142-X

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.009

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 11 , Pages 827-835, November 2007