Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 9 , Pages 755-759, September 2007

Potential of fluoridated carbamide peroxide gels to support post-bleaching enamel re-hardening

  • Thomas Attin

      Affiliations

    • Clinic for Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: University Dental School, Plattenstr. 11, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • ,
  • Herbert Betke

      Affiliations

    • Department of Operative Dentistry, Preventive Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
  • ,
  • Fabienne Schippan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Operative Dentistry, Preventive Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
  • ,
  • Annette Wiegand

      Affiliations

    • Clinic for Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Received 18 June 2007; accepted 25 June 2007.

Abstract 

Objective

Aim of the in vitro study was to evaluate the time period needed to re-establish enamel surface microhardness after bleaching with fluoridated (0.5% F as NaF) and unfluoridated carbamide peroxide (CP) bleaching gels under a daily de- and remineralization protocol.

Materials and methods

Ninety enamel specimens were prepared from bovine incisors and prepared for Knoop microhardness determination. The samples were divided into five groups and bleached for 7 days (8h per day) with experimentally designed neutral and acidic 10% CP gels: A (0.5% F, pH 7.0), B (0.5% F, pH 5.5), C (no F, pH 7.0) and D (no F, pH 5.5). Group E served as control and was not bleached. After each 8-h bleaching period the samples were subjected to a de- and remineralization protocol. In the following 5 days, the specimens were not bleached, but stored in artificial saliva for 8h instead; the daily de- and remineralization cycles were maintained during this period. Knoop microhardness determinations were conducted at baseline, after each bleaching interval and after completion of each daily de- and remineralization cycle. A repeated measures two-way ANOVA statistical analysis and a comparison of confidence intervals was conducted to check for hardness recovery during the post-bleaching period.

Results

After completion of bleaching therapy on day 7 a statistically significant hardness loss was observed for all bleaching groups in the range of about 7–15% hardness reduction as compared to baseline. The fluoridated gels proved significantly less hardness loss than the unfluoridated gels. In the following period, from days 8 to 12 recovery of hardness to baseline data was observed in the fluoridated groups (A and B) after the first de-/remineralization cycle on day 8 (group A) and after the second 8-h remineralization period on day 9 (group B), respectively. Hardness of the specimens treated with the unfluoridated bleaching gel C returned to baseline values after day 10. The samples of group D did not show recover of hardness data during the 5-day post-bleaching period.

Conclusion

Fluoridated 10% carbamide peroxide bleaching gels support re-hardening of bleached enamel with a shorter period needed for hardness recover as compared to unfluoridated gels.

Keywords: Bleaching, Carbamide peroxide, Fluoride, Hardness

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(07)00117-0

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2007.06.005

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 9 , Pages 755-759, September 2007