Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 9 , Pages 744-748 , September 2007

The influence of personality on patients’ satisfaction with existing and new complete dentures

  • Michael Robert Fenlon

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthodontics, King's College London Dental Institute, Floor 25, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 20 71887478; fax: +44 20 71887486.
  • ,
  • Martyn Sherriff

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Biomaterials Science, King's College London Dental Institute, London, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Jonathan Tim Newton

      Affiliations

    • Psychology in Relation to Dentistry, Department of Dental Public Health, King's College London Dental Institute, London, United Kingdom

Received 22 May 2007 ,Revised 16 June 2007 ,Accepted 18 June 2007.

References 

  1. Sobolik CH, Larson HJ. Predicting denture acceptance through psychotechnics. Journal of Dental Education. 1968;32:434–440
  2. Bolender CL, Swoope CC, Smith DE. The Cornell Medical Index as a prognostic aid for complete denture patients. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1969;22:20–29
  3. Nairn RI, Brunello DL. The relationship of denture complaints and level of neuroticism. Dental Practitioner & Dental Review. 1971;21:156–158
  4. Guckes AD, Smith DE, Swoope CC. Counceling and related factors influencing satisfaction with dentures. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1978;39:259–267
  5. Smith M. Measurement of personality traits and their relationship to patient satisfaction with complete dentures. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1976;35:492–503
  6. Berg E, Johnsen TB. Ingbretsen R. Psychological variables and patient acceptance of complete dentures. Acta Odontolica Scandinavica. 1986;43:199–203
  7. Smith JP, Hughes D. A survey of referred patients experiencing problems with complete dentures. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1988;60:583–586
  8. Al Quran F, Clifford T, Cooper C, Lamey PJ. Influence of psychological factors on acceptance of complete dentures. Gerodontology. 2001;18:35–40
  9. Klages U, Esch M. Oral helath impact in patients wearing removable prostheses: relations to somatization, pain sensitivity, and body consciousness. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2005;2:106–111
  10. Ozdemir AK, Ozdemir HD, Polat NT, Turgut M, Sezer H. The effect of personality type on denture satisfaction. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2006;19:364–370
  11. Fenlon MR, Sherriff M, Walter JD. An investigation of factors influencing patients’ use of new complete dentures using structural equation modelling techniques. Community Dentistry & Oral Epidemiology. 2000;28:133–140
  12. Fenlon MR, Sherriff M, Walter JD. Agreement between clinical measures of quality and patients’ rating of fit of existing and new complete dentures. Journal of Dentistry. 2002;30:135–139
  13. Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SGB. Administering the questionnaires. Manual of the Eysenck personality scales. London: Stodder and Houghton; 1991;33 p.
  14. Woelfel JB, Paffenbarger GC, Sweeney WT. Clinical evaluation of complete dentures made of 11 different types of denture base materials. Journal of the American Dental Association. 1965;70:1170–1188
  15. Somers RH. A new asymmetric measure of association for ordinal variables. American Sociological Review. 1962;27:799–811
  16. Newson R. Multiple test procedures and smile plots. The Stata Journal. 2001;1:1–23
  17. Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SGB. The nature of E and N. Manual of the Eysenck personality scales. London: Stodder and Houghton; 1991;p. 4–5

PII: S0300-5712(07)00115-7

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.06.003

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 9 , Pages 744-748 , September 2007