Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 6 , Pages 482-489 , June 2007

Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with resin-based composites with and without an intermediary flowable layer

  • R.R. Cara

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Materials, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
  • ,
  • G.J.P. Fleming

      Affiliations

    • Materials Science Unit, Division of Oral Biosciences, Dublin Dental School & Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +353 1 612 7371; fax: +353 1 612 7297.
  • ,
  • W.M. Palin

      Affiliations

    • University of Birmingham School of Dentistry, St. Chad's Queensway, Birmingham B4 6NN, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • A.D. Walmsley

      Affiliations

    • University of Birmingham School of Dentistry, St. Chad's Queensway, Birmingham B4 6NN, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • F.J.T. Burke

      Affiliations

    • University of Birmingham School of Dentistry, St. Chad's Queensway, Birmingham B4 6NN, United Kingdom

Received 26 October 2006 ,Revised 4 January 2007 ,Accepted 10 January 2007.

References 

  1. Ferracane JF, Greener EH. The effect of resin formulation on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorative resin. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 1986;20:121–131
  2. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerisation shrinkage and polymerisation shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. Journal of Dentistry. 1997;25:435–440
  3. Davidson CL, DeGee AJ, Feilzer AJ. The competition between the composite–dentin bond strength and the polymerisation contraction stress. Journal of Dental Research. 1984;63:1396–1399
  4. Causton BE, Miller B, Sefton J. The deformation of cusps by bonded posterior composite restorations: an in vitro study. British Dental Journal. 1985;159:397–400
  5. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Pintado MR, DeLong R, Douglas WH. Residual shrinkage stress distributions in molars after composite restoration. Dental Materials. 2004;20:554–564
  6. Tantbirojna D, Versluis A, Pintado MR, DeLong R, Douglas WH. Tooth deformation patterns in molars after composite restoration. Dental Materials. 2004;20:535–542
  7. Brannstrom M. The hydrodynamic theory of dentinal pain: sensation in preparations, caries, and the dentinal crack syndrome. Journal of Endocrinology. 1986;12:453–457
  8. Marzouk MA, Ross JA. Cervical enamel crazings associated with occluso-proximal composite restorations in posterior teeth. American Journal of Dentistry. 1989;2:333–337
  9. Eick JD, Welch FH. Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins an its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quintessence International. 1986;17:103–111
  10. Lutz F, Krejici I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dental Materials. 1991;7:107–113
  11. Fleming GJP, Hall D, Shorthall ACC, Burke FJT. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with posterior filling materials of varying reported volumetric shrinkage values. Journal of Dentistry. 2005;33:139–146
  12. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Assessing the effect of composite formulation on polymerization stress. Journal of the American Dental Association. 2000;131:497–503
  13. Watts DC, Al Hindi A. Intrinsic ‘soft-start’ polymerisation shrinkage-kinetics in an acrylate-based resin-composite. Dental Materials. 1999;15:39–45
  14. Musanje L, Darvell BW. Polymerization of resin composite restorative materials: exposure reciprocity. Dental Materials. 2003;19:531–541
  15. Alomari QD, Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB. Effect of liners on cusp deflection and gap formation in composite restorations. Operative Dentistry. 2001;26:406–411
  16. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. Journal of Dental Research. 1990;69:1240–1243
  17. Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, et al. Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. Journal of Dental Research. 1993;72:1434–1442
  18. Unterbrink GL, Liebenberg WH. Flowable resin composites as “filled adhesives”: literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence International. 1999;30:249–257
  19. Tung FF, Estafan D, Scherer W. Microleakage of a condensable resin composite: an in vitro investigation. Quintessence International. 2000;31:430–434
  20. Leevailoj C, Cochran MA, Matis BA, Moore BK, Platt JA. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners. Operative Dentistry. 2001;26:302–307
  21. Belli S, Inokoshi S, Ozer F, Pereira PN, Ogata M, Tagami J. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations. Operative Dentistry. 2001;26:70–75
  22. Beznos C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Operative Dentistry. 2001;26:60–69
  23. Chuang SF, Liu JK, Chao CC, Liao FP, Chen YH. Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2001;85:177–183
  24. Jain P, Belcher M. Microleakage of Class II resin-based composite restorations with flowable composite in the proximal box. American Journal of Dentistry. 2000;13:235–238
  25. Wibowo G, Stockton L. Microleakage of Class II composite restorations. American Journal of Dentistry. 2001;14:177–185
  26. Data Sheet for Filtek™ P60 supplied by 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA.
  27. Data Sheet for Filtek™ Supreme supplied by 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA.
  28. Data Sheet for Filtek™ Flow supplied by 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA.
  29. Abbas G, Fleming GJP, Harrington E, Shorthall ACC, Burke FJT. Cuspal movement in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or incrementally. Journal of Dentistry. 2003;31:437–444
  30. Palin WM, Fleming GJP, Nathwani H, Burke FJT, Randall RC. In vitro cuspal deflection and microleakage of maxillary premolars restored with novel low-shrink dental composites. Dental Materials. 2005;21:324–335
  31. Fleming GJP, Cara RR, Palin WM, Burke FJT. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with posterior filling materials cured using ‘soft-start’ polymerisation. Dental Materials. 2007;23:637–643
  32. Fleming GJP, Khan S, Afsal O, Palin WM, Burke FJT. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with posterior filling materials cured using ‘soft-start’ polymerisation. Journal of Dentistry. 2007;35:97–103
  33. Data Sheet for Scotchbond™ 1. Adhesive supplied by 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA, 2006.
  34. Palmer DS, Barco MT, Billy EJ. Temperature extremes produced orally by hot and cold liquids. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1992;67:325–327
  35. Spierings TM, Peters MB, Bosman F, Plasschaert AM. Verification of theoretical modelling of heat transmission in teeth by in vivo experiments. Journal of Dental Research. 1987;66:1336–1339
  36. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. Journal of the American Dental Association. 1998;129:567–577
  37. Braga RR, Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL. Contraction stress of flowable composite materials and their efficacy as stress-relieving layers. Journal of the American Dental Association. 2003;134:721–728
  38. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoratives. Journal of Dental Research. 1987;66:1636–1639
  39. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dental Materials. 1999;15:128–137
  40. Suliman AA, Boyer DB, Lakes RS. Cusp movement in premolars resulting from composite polymerization shrinkage. Dental Materials. 1993;9:6–10
  41. Cerutti A, Flocchini P, Madini L, Mangani F, Putignano A, Docchio F. Effects of bonded composite vs. amalgam on resistance to cuspal deflection for endodontically-treated premolar teeth. American Journal of Dentistry. 2004;17:295–300
  42. Gonzalez-Lopez S, Lucena-Martin C, de Haro-Gasquet F, Vilchez-Diaz MA, de Haro-Munoz C. Influence of different composite restoration techniques on cuspal deflection: an in vitro study. Operative Dentistry. 2004;29:656–660
  43. Segura A, Donly KJ. In vitro posterior composite polymerization recovery following hygroscopic expansion. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 1993;20:495–499
  44. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses?. Journal of Dental Research. 1996;75:871–878
  45. Jantarat J, Panitvisai P, Palamara JEA, Messer HH. Comparison of methods for measuring cuspal deformation of teeth. Journal of Dentistry. 2001;29:75–82
  46. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Relaxation of polymerization contraction shear stress by hygroscopic expansion. Journal of Dental Research. 1990;69:36–39
  47. Ferracane JL. Developing a more complete understanding of stresses produced in dental composites during polymerization. Dental Materials. 2005;21:36–42
  48. Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D. Flow, strength, stiffness and radiopacity of flowable resin composites. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association. 2003;69:516–521
  49. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Composite restorations: influence of flowable and self-curing resin composite linings on microleakage in vitro. Operative Dentistry. 2002;27:569–575
  50. Payne JH. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 1999;23:123–130
  51. Tredwin CJ, Stokes A, Moles DR. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites. Operative Dentistry. 2005;30:32–38
  52. Efes BG, Dorter C, Gomec Y, Koray F. Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer and nanofill composite with and without a flowable liner. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2006;8:119–126
  53. Chuang SF, Liu JK, Jin YT. Microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations with flowable composite linings. Operative Dentistry. 2001;26:193–200
  54. Ferdianakis K. Microleakage reduction from newer esthetic restorative materials in permanent molars. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 1998;22:221–229
  55. Gueders AM, Charpentier JF, Albert AI, Geerts SO. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining. Operative Dentistry. 2006;31:450–455
  56. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dental Materials. 2005;21:864–881

PII: S0300-5712(07)00016-4

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.01.005

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 6 , Pages 482-489 , June 2007