Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 4 , Pages 309-317 , April 2007

The impact of montmorillonite clay addition on the in vitro wear resistance of a glass-ionomer restorative

Received 31 July 2006 ,Revised 29 September 2006 ,Accepted 10 October 2006.

References 

  1. Sheldon T, Treasure E. Dental restoration: what type of filling?. Effective Health Care. 1999;5:1–11
  2. Darvell BW. The corrosion of silver amalgam—a photometric method. Journal of Dentistry. 1973;1:255–260
  3. Lutz F. The postamalgam age. Operative Dentistry. 1995;20:218–222
  4. Tyas MJ. Dental amalgam—what are the alternatives?. International Dental Journal. 1994;44:303–308
  5. Christensen GJ. Restoration of pediatric posterior teeth. Journal of the American Dental Association. 1996;127:106–108
  6. Hotz P, McLean JW, Wilson AD. The bonding of glass ionomer cements to metal and tooth structures. British Dental Journal. 1977;142:41–47
  7. Wilson AD, Kent BE. Dentistry, the glass ionomer cement. British Dental Journal. 1972;132:133–135
  8. Naasan MA, Watson TF. Conventional glass ionomers as posterior restorations. American Journal of Dentistry. 1998;11:36–45
  9. Mount GJ. Glass ionomers: a review of their current status. Operative Dentistry. 1999;24:115–124
  10. Mair LH, Stolarski TA, Vowles RW, Lloyd CH. Wear: mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. report of a workshop. Journal of Dentistry. 1996;24:141–148
  11. Cvar JF, Ryge G. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. United States Public Health Service Publication #790-244. San Francisco: US Government Printing Office; 1971;
  12. Leinfelder KF, Taylor DF, Barkmeier WW, Goldberg AJ. Quantitative wear measurement of posterior composite resins. Dental Materials. 1986;2:198–201
  13. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. International Dental Journal. 1980;30:347–357
  14. Taylor DF, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD. Comparison of direct and indirect methods for analysing wear of posterior composite restorations. Dental Materials. 1989;5:157–160
  15. McDowell GC, Bloem TJ, Lang BR, Asgar K. In vivo wear. Part 1: the Michigan computer-graphic measuring system. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1988;60:112–120
  16. Conry JP, Beyer JP, Pintado MR, Douglas WH. Measurement of preventative resin restorations using computer profilometry. Journal of Dentistry for Children. 1992;59:177–181
  17. DeLong R, Douglas WH. Development of an artificial oral environment for the testing of dental restoratives: bi-axial force and movement control. Journal of Dental Research. 1983;62:32–36
  18. de Gee AJ, Pallav P, Davidson CL. Effect of abrasion medium on wear of stress-bearing composites and amalgam in vitro. Journal of Dental Research. 1986;65:654–658
  19. Leinfelder KF, Beaudreau RW, Mazer RB. An in vitro device for predicting clinical wear. Quintessence International. 1989;20:755–761
  20. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. A new multi-mode oral wear simulator. Dental Materials. 1996;12:218–226
  21. Pelka M, Ebert J, Schneider H, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Comparison of two- and three-body wear of glass-ionomers and composites. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 1996;104:132–137
  22. de Gee AJ, van Duinen RNB, Werner A, Davidson CL. Early and long-term wear of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers. Journal of Dental Research. 1996;75:1613–1619
  23. Kunzelmann KH, Bürkle V, Bauer C. Two-body and three-body wear of glass ionomer cements. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2003;13:434–440
  24. de Gee AJ, Leloup G, Werner A, Vreven J, Davidson CL. Structural integrity of resin-modified glass ionomers affected by the delay or omission of light activation. Journal of Dental Research. 1998;77:1658–1663
  25. van Duinen RNB, Kleverlaan CJ, de Gee AJ, Werner A, Feilzer AJ. Early and long-term wear of ‘fast-set’ conventional glass ionomers. Dental Materials. 2005;21:716–720
  26. Dowling AH, Stamboulis A, Fleming GJP. The influence of montmorillonite clay reinforcement on the performance of a glass ionomer restorative. Journal of Dentistry. 2006;34:802–810
  27. Product specification for ChemFil® Superior (Dentsply DeTrey, Kanstanz, Germany).
  28. Utracki LA. Basic elements of polymeric nanocomposites technology. In:  Utracki LA editors. Clay-containing polymeric nanocomposites. vol. 1:Shropshire: Rapra Technology; 2004;p. 35–256
  29. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Factors effecting dental composite wear in vitro. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 1997;38:303–313
  30. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level and filler treatment. Journal of Dental Research. 1997;76:1405–1411
  31. Correr GM, Alonso RCB, Sobrinho LC, Puppin-Rontani RM, Ferracane JL. In vitro wear of resin-based materials—simultaneous corrosive and abrasive wear. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2006;78:105–114
  32. Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Ferracane LL. Wear and fatigue behaviour of nano-structured dental resin composites. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2006;78:196–203
  33. Sulong MZAM, Aziz RA. Wear of materials used in dentistry: a review of the literature. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1990;63:342–349
  34. DeLong R. Intra-oral restorative materials wear: rethinking the current approaches: how to measure wear. Dental Materials. 2006;22:702–711
  35. Archard JF. Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. Journal of Applied Physics. 1953;24:981–988
  36. DeLong R, Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, Pintado MR. The wear of dental amalgam in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. Dental Materials. 1985;1:238–242
  37. Ferracane JL. Is the wear of dental composites still a clinical concern? Is there still a need for in vitro wear simulating devices?. Dental Materials. 2006;22:689–692
  38. Heintze SD. How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. Dental Materials. 2006;22:712–734
  39. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Evaluation of seven commercial composites using new in vitro wear simulator. Journal of Dental Research. 2002;81:A337;[abstract number 2683]
  40. Sorensen JA, Pham M. In vitro wear of composite resins processed with various systems. Journal of Dental Research. 2002;81:A324;[abstract number 2578]
  41. Seghi R, Pollock M, Lannutti J. Wear resistance of various nano-structured composites. Journal of Dental Research. 2002;81:A414;[abstract number 3358]
  42. Pintado MR, Anderson GA, DeLong R, Douglas WH. Variation in tooth wear in young adults over a two-year period. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1997;77:313–320
  43. Fischer H. Polymer nanocomposites: from fundamental research to specific applications. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2003;23:763–772
  44. Dasari A, Yu ZZ, Mai YW, Hu GH, Varlet J. Clay exfoliation and organic modification of nylon 6 nanocomposites processed by different routes. Composites Science and Technology. 2005;65:2314–2328

PII: S0300-5712(06)00196-5

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.10.002

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 4 , Pages 309-317 , April 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution